College Football Playoff
The College Football Playoff field is set and you can argue that one of the four best teams in the nation is not part of it. In my College Football Power Ratings, I have Notre Dame ranked fourth in the nation. Not only are they not in the field of 12, but they said the hell with it and decided to bypass the bowl season altogether. Given how poorly Alabama played against Georgia, the Crimson Tide shouldn’t be in. But, they are, and that’s the way it goes with a SEC bias and seemingly a punishment towards Notre Dame for not being willing to join a conference.
I’ve updated my power ratings for the CFP and the Army/Navy game. I’ll have to make adjustments for the bowl season once all of those matchups are set and we start to get an idea of who is sticking around to play and who isn’t. I’ll be putting my power ratings together for that later in the week and will post another article.
For now, this is an update after conference championship week, but it does list all 136 FBS teams.
College Football Playoff Power Ratings
| Rank | Team | PR | HFA |
| 1 | Ohio State | 92.5 | 3.5 |
| 2 | Indiana | 91 | 2.5 |
| 3 | Texas Tech | 90 | 3 |
| 4 | Notre Dame | 88.5 | 3 |
| 5 | Texas A&M | 88 | 2 |
| 6 | Oregon | 87.5 | 3.5 |
| 7 | Georgia | 87.5 | 3 |
| 8 | Vanderbilt | 84.5 | 1.5 |
| 9 | Mississippi | 84.5 | 3 |
| 10 | Miami (Florida) | 84.5 | 2 |
| 11 | Alabama | 84.5 | 3.5 |
| 12 | Texas | 84 | 3.5 |
| 13 | Oklahoma | 82 | 3 |
| 14 | Utah | 80.5 | 3 |
| 15 | USC | 80 | 3 |
| 16 | Missouri | 79.5 | 3.5 |
| 17 | Michigan | 79.5 | 3 |
| 18 | Iowa | 78.5 | 3 |
| 19 | Auburn | 78 | 2 |
| 20 | Penn State | 77 | 3.5 |
| 21 | Tennessee | 76 | 3.5 |
| 22 | South Florida | 76 | 1.5 |
| 23 | Pittsburgh | 76 | 2 |
| 24 | Arizona | 75.5 | 2 |
| 25 | Washington | 75 | 3.5 |
| 26 | BYU | 75 | 2 |
| 27 | Illinois | 74.5 | 2 |
| 28 | Clemson | 74 | 2.5 |
| 29 | North Texas | 73.5 | 2 |
| 30 | LSU | 73.5 | 3.5 |
| 31 | Mississippi State | 73 | 2 |
| 32 | Georgia Tech | 73 | 2 |
| 33 | Arkansas | 73 | 2 |
| 34 | Florida State | 72.5 | 2 |
| 35 | Florida | 72.5 | 2 |
| 36 | SMU | 72 | 3.5 |
| 37 | TCU | 71.5 | 3 |
| 38 | James Madison | 71.5 | 3 |
| 39 | Tulane | 71 | 2.5 |
| 40 | Iowa State | 70.5 | 2 |
| 41 | South Carolina | 70 | 2.5 |
| 42 | Kentucky | 69.5 | 2 |
| 43 | Virginia | 69 | 2 |
| 44 | Nebraska | 69 | 2 |
| 45 | Louisville | 69 | 3.5 |
| 46 | Kansas State | 69 | 3.5 |
| 47 | Arizona State | 69 | 2 |
| 48 | North Carolina State | 68.5 | 2 |
| 49 | Cincinnati | 68.5 | 1.5 |
| 50 | Kansas | 67.5 | 2.5 |
| 51 | Wisconsin | 67 | 2 |
| 52 | Northwestern | 67 | 1.5 |
| 53 | Houston | 67 | 2 |
| 54 | East Carolina | 67 | 2 |
| 55 | Baylor | 67 | 2 |
| 56 | Duke | 66 | 3.5 |
| 57 | Boise State | 66 | 3.5 |
| 58 | Wake Forest | 65.5 | 2 |
| 59 | Toledo | 65.5 | 3 |
| 60 | San Diego State | 65.5 | 2 |
| 61 | Old Dominion | 64.5 | 1.5 |
| 62 | Navy | 64.5 | 2 |
| 63 | Memphis | 64.5 | 2.5 |
| 64 | Connecticut | 64.5 | 2.5 |
| 65 | Michigan State | 64 | 2 |
| 66 | Purdue | 63.5 | 1 |
| 67 | New Mexico | 63.5 | 2 |
| 68 | UNLV | 63 | 2.5 |
| 69 | Rutgers | 63 | 2 |
| 70 | Minnesota | 63 | 2 |
| 71 | Virginia Tech | 62.5 | 2 |
| 72 | West Virginia | 62 | 2 |
| 73 | North Carolina | 62 | 2 |
| 74 | Washington State | 61.5 | 3 |
| 75 | UTSA | 61.5 | 3.5 |
| 76 | UCLA | 61.5 | 2 |
| 77 | UCF | 61.5 | 2 |
| 78 | Maryland | 61 | 2 |
| 79 | Utah State | 60.5 | 2 |
| 80 | Texas State | 60 | 2 |
| 81 | Army | 60 | 2.5 |
| 82 | Hawai’i | 59.5 | 2 |
| 83 | Kennesaw State | 58 | 1.5 |
| 84 | Colorado | 58 | 2 |
| 85 | California | 57.5 | 2 |
| 86 | Western Michigan | 57 | 2 |
| 87 | Temple | 57 | 2 |
| 88 | Stanford | 57 | 1 |
| 89 | Fresno State | 57 | 2 |
| 90 | Southern Mississippi | 56.5 | 2 |
| 91 | Ohio | 56.5 | 3.5 |
| 92 | Florida Atlantic | 56.5 | 2 |
| 93 | Boston College | 55.5 | 2 |
| 94 | Miami (Ohio) | 55 | 2.5 |
| 95 | Western Kentucky | 54.5 | 2.5 |
| 96 | Tulsa | 54.5 | 1 |
| 97 | Troy | 53.5 | 3 |
| 98 | South Alabama | 53 | 2 |
| 99 | Arkansas State | 53 | 2 |
| 100 | Marshall | 52.5 | 3 |
| 101 | Louisiana-Lafayette | 52.5 | 2 |
| 102 | Oklahoma State | 52 | 2 |
| 103 | Jacksonville State | 52 | 3.5 |
| 104 | San Jose State | 51.5 | 2.5 |
| 105 | Central Michigan | 51.5 | 2 |
| 106 | Oregon State | 51 | 3.5 |
| 107 | Georgia Southern | 51 | 3.5 |
| 108 | Missouri State | 50.5 | 2 |
| 109 | Wyoming | 50 | 2 |
| 110 | Rice | 50 | 3 |
| 111 | Liberty | 50 | 3 |
| 112 | Florida International | 50 | 2 |
| 113 | UAB | 49.5 | 2.5 |
| 114 | Syracuse | 49.5 | 2.5 |
| 115 | Nevada | 49.5 | 1 |
| 116 | Buffalo | 49.5 | 2 |
| 117 | Air Force | 49.5 | 2 |
| 118 | Louisiana Tech | 49 | 2 |
| 119 | Appalachian State | 49 | 2 |
| 120 | Delaware | 48 | 3 |
| 121 | Eastern Michigan | 47.5 | 2 |
| 122 | Coastal Carolina | 47 | 2 |
| 123 | Northern Illinois | 45.5 | 1 |
| 124 | Middle Tennessee | 45.5 | 2 |
| 125 | Colorado State | 45.5 | 2 |
| 126 | UTEP | 44.5 | 2 |
| 127 | Bowling Green | 44.5 | 2 |
| 128 | Akron | 44.5 | 2 |
| 129 | New Mexico State | 44 | 2.5 |
| 130 | Louisiana-Monroe | 42.5 | 2 |
| 131 | Kent State | 42 | 1 |
| 132 | Georgia State | 42 | 1 |
| 133 | Ball State | 39.5 | 2.5 |
| 134 | Sam Houston State | 37.5 | 0.5 |
| 135 | Charlotte | 36.5 | 1 |
| 136 | Massachusetts | 28.5 | 1 |
Here are my power ratings adjustments:
Up: Kennesaw State +1.5, Troy +1, Tulane +2, Boise State +3, Texas Tech +2, Georgia +1.5, Indiana +1, Mississippi +3, Oklahoma +1
Down: James Madison -3, North Texas -1.5, UNLV -1, BYU -2, Alabama -1.5, Virginia -2, Ohio State -1.5
Some notes on the biggest movers:
Boise State +3: The return of Maddux Madsen pushed the Mountain West Championship Game line all the way out to 6. I had it Boise State -2.5, so 3 or so seemed like a fair adjustment.
Mississippi +3: I had gotten a little lower on Ole Miss with the whole Lane Kiffin fiasco, but the team should have moved on now with Pete Golding and they have the biggest chip of any CFP team’s shoulders.
James Madison -3: This is a tough one and I’ll expand some here. So, we’ve been seeing a lot of teams in conference play for a while now. How they stack up against their peers will be a lot different than they stand up nationally. I still can’t get to the market number on this game, even with this adjustment. My Tulane line against Ole Miss is the same way.
A team like James Madison that is a massive favorite against every other conference member has to be given that respect, but they are indeed out-talented in this type of playoff environment. They didn’t cover against Troy, and weather was part of that, but I did downgrade them a little bit.
My College Football Playoff Lines
(note: games are ordered chronologically)
I did feel like I should add Army and Navy here, even though that is not a College Football Playoff game.
| Date | Away Team | Home Team | Line |
| 12/13 | Army | Navy | -4.5 |
| 12/31 | James Madison | Oregon | -19.5 |
| 1/1 | Tulane | Mississippi | -16.5 |
| Alabama | Oklahoma | -0.5 | |
| Miami (FL) | Texas A&M | -5.5 |
Some games to consider based on my lines vs. the market:
As of right now, I don’t have any CFP bets. Alabama at a short price might be a take for me (despite my line) given the huge yardage disparity of the first game, but that’s about it for now.
I do lean towards Texas A&M at present, mostly looking to fade Mario Cristobal, but I don’t have any key number equity comparing my line to the market or anything like that.
I’ll be posting a separate article with my College Football Power Ratings and lines for the bowl season later this week.





