Week 5 College Football Power Ratings:
Four weeks are in the books for the college football season and there is a lot to unpack. Like I said last week, the process of moving away from all the summer research to more heavily weigh what we’ve seen to this point takes place at this time of the season. Some teams that I wanted to fade have really exceeded expectations, while others have been exactly what I expected.
Other teams were bad at the outset and have figured it out, while others got off to decent starts and have faltered since. I think one of the biggest lessons I’ve learned over the years is that you really do have to be flexible and willing to adjust at all times. Digging in can be very costly. It may work out in the long run, but you have to know when to draw a hard line and when to bend that line a little bit.
***Top College Football Betting Resources***
*It's the VSiN Black Friday Special. Take advantage of the largest savings of the year by upgrading to VSiN Pro. For a limited time, you can secure Pro access until May 1st for only $60.*
- NCAAF Expert Picks
- NCAAF Betting Hub
- NCAAF 2024 Week-By-Week Schedule
- Parlay Calculator
- NCAAF Betting Splits
- NCAAF Betting Odds
The nice thing is that if you are chasing a power rating for a team or just don’t have a good feel, you simply don’t have to bet on that team’s games. In college football, where the roster turnover is excessive and the performances can vary greatly, you can key in on the teams that you know you have a good feel for and bet on or against them accordingly. The beauty of the CFB schedule is that there are so many teams and there are so many games that you never have a shortage.
We have a lot more conference play this week and starting next week, we’ll see almost nothing but conference play. There isn’t quite as much familiarity between teams as there used to be with the portal, NIL, how often coaches change teams, etc., but conference games tend to have a little bit more predictability to them than the non-conference games.
They also mean a little bit more to the programs and coaches. In the never-ending arms race of college football, showing recruits that you can play well in conference action is hugely important. The better you play in those games, the better your chances of going to a bowl game or playing something else meaningful. Recruits want spotlight games. They want to play on big stages.
My power ratings are updated, box scores have been studied, and lines are out to use as a comparison.
Here are my Week 5 College Football Power Ratings
Rank | Team | PR | HFA |
1 | Georgia | 95.5 | 3 |
2 | Ohio State | 93 | 3.5 |
3 | Texas | 92 | 3.5 |
4 | Alabama | 89 | 3.5 |
5 | Tennessee | 89 | 3.5 |
6 | Mississippi | 87.5 | 3.5 |
7 | Oregon | 87.5 | 3.5 |
8 | Miami (Florida) | 86 | 2 |
9 | Penn State | 84 | 3.5 |
10 | Clemson | 83.5 | 3 |
11 | Notre Dame | 83.5 | 3.5 |
12 | USC | 82 | 2 |
13 | LSU | 81 | 3.5 |
14 | Louisville | 80.5 | 3.5 |
15 | Texas A&M | 79.5 | 3 |
16 | Utah | 79.5 | 3.5 |
17 | Iowa State | 78 | 2 |
18 | Kansas State | 77.5 | 3.5 |
19 | Oklahoma | 77.5 | 3.5 |
20 | Iowa | 77 | 2.5 |
21 | Missouri | 77 | 2 |
22 | Indiana | 76 | 1.5 |
23 | Michigan | 76 | 3.5 |
24 | UCF | 76 | 3 |
25 | Arkansas | 74.5 | 2 |
26 | Nebraska | 74.5 | 2 |
27 | Oklahoma State | 74.5 | 3.5 |
28 | Pittsburgh | 74.5 | 2 |
29 | Arizona | 74 | 2 |
30 | Boise State | 73.5 | 2.5 |
31 | BYU | 73 | 2 |
32 | Georgia Tech | 73 | 1 |
33 | Rutgers | 73 | 2 |
34 | South Carolina | 72.5 | 2.5 |
35 | Auburn | 72 | 2 |
36 | Kentucky | 72 | 2.5 |
37 | Kansas | 71.5 | 2 |
38 | Texas Tech | 71.5 | 2.5 |
39 | Virginia Tech | 71.5 | 2 |
40 | West Virginia | 71.5 | 3 |
41 | Florida | 71 | 2 |
42 | Washington | 71 | 2 |
43 | California | 70.5 | 2 |
44 | TCU | 70.5 | 2.5 |
45 | Boston College | 70 | 1.5 |
46 | Memphis | 70 | 2 |
47 | Tulane | 70 | 2 |
48 | Wisconsin | 70 | 2 |
49 | Florida State | 69.5 | 2 |
50 | Minnesota | 69.5 | 2 |
51 | SMU | 69.5 | 3.5 |
52 | Illinois | 69 | 2 |
53 | Maryland | 69 | 2 |
54 | Baylor | 68.5 | 2 |
55 | UNLV | 68.5 | 2 |
56 | Colorado | 68 | 2 |
57 | Arizona State | 67.5 | 2 |
58 | Michigan State | 67.5 | 2.5 |
59 | Virginia | 67.5 | 2 |
60 | Cincinnati | 67 | 2 |
61 | Fresno State | 66.5 | 2.5 |
62 | Syracuse | 66.5 | 2.5 |
63 | Oregon State | 66 | 3.5 |
64 | South Florida | 66 | 2 |
65 | UCLA | 66 | 2 |
66 | Washington State | 66 | 2.5 |
67 | Bowling Green | 64.5 | 2 |
68 | Louisiana-Lafayette | 64.5 | 3 |
69 | North Carolina | 64.5 | 2.5 |
70 | Liberty | 63.5 | 3 |
71 | Stanford | 63.5 | 1 |
72 | Duke | 63 | 3 |
73 | Purdue | 63 | 2 |
74 | Texas State | 63 | 2 |
75 | Wake Forest | 63 | 2.5 |
76 | Toledo | 62.5 | 2.5 |
77 | Miami (Ohio) | 62 | 3 |
78 | Northwestern | 62 | 1.5 |
79 | South Alabama | 62 | 2.5 |
80 | Houston | 61 | 2 |
81 | James Madison | 61 | 3.5 |
82 | Navy | 60 | 2 |
83 | Appalachian State | 59.5 | 2.5 |
84 | East Carolina | 59.5 | 2 |
85 | North Carolina State | 59.5 | 3.5 |
86 | San Jose State | 59.5 | 2 |
87 | Northern Illinois | 59 | 1.5 |
88 | UTSA | 59 | 3.5 |
89 | Vanderbilt | 59 | 1 |
90 | Army | 58.5 | 2 |
91 | Mississippi State | 58.5 | 2 |
92 | Sam Houston State | 58.5 | 2 |
93 | Western Kentucky | 58.5 | 2.5 |
94 | Coastal Carolina | 58 | 2.5 |
95 | UAB | 58 | 2.5 |
96 | Georgia Southern | 57.5 | 2 |
97 | Marshall | 57 | 2 |
98 | North Texas | 57 | 2 |
99 | Nevada | 56.5 | 1.5 |
100 | Arkansas State | 56 | 2 |
101 | Old Dominion | 56 | 2 |
102 | Jacksonville State | 55 | 2.5 |
103 | Western Michigan | 55 | 2 |
104 | Georgia State | 54 | 2 |
105 | Rice | 53.5 | 2 |
106 | Air Force | 53 | 2.5 |
107 | Ohio | 53 | 2 |
108 | San Diego State | 53 | 2 |
109 | Tulsa | 53 | 1 |
110 | Colorado State | 52 | 1 |
111 | Hawai’i | 52 | 2 |
112 | Buffalo | 51.5 | 1 |
113 | Connecticut | 51.5 | 2 |
114 | Troy | 51 | 2.5 |
115 | Utah State | 51 | 2 |
116 | Eastern Michigan | 50.5 | 2 |
117 | Wyoming | 49.5 | 2.5 |
118 | Louisiana-Monroe | 49 | 2 |
119 | New Mexico | 49 | 1 |
120 | Louisiana Tech | 48 | 2 |
121 | Florida Atlantic | 47.5 | 2 |
122 | Southern Mississippi | 47.5 | 2 |
123 | Ball State | 47 | 2 |
124 | Central Michigan | 46.5 | 2 |
125 | Temple | 46 | 2 |
126 | Massachusetts | 45.5 | 1 |
127 | Charlotte | 45 | 1 |
128 | Akron | 44.5 | 1 |
129 | New Mexico State | 44.5 | 2.5 |
130 | UTEP | 44.5 | 2 |
131 | Florida International | 44 | 1 |
132 | Middle Tennessee | 43.5 | 2 |
133 | Kennesaw State | 43 | 2 |
134 | Kent State | 37 | 2 |
Here are this week’s Power Ratings adjustments:
Up: South Alabama +3, Stanford +2, Illinois +2, San Jose State +2, Virginia +2, Michigan State +2, Buffalo +2, Indiana +2.5, James Madison +1.5, Louisville +2.5, Clemson +2.5, Miami (FL) +3, Iowa +1.5, Temple +3, Army +2.5, Rutgers +3, Fresno State +1.5, BYU +4, UTEP +1, Colorado +3, Jacksonville State +2, Arkansas +2.5, Tennessee +3, Louisiana +3.5, Texas Tech +3.5, Michigan +1.5, Bowling Green +3, Navy +5, UConn +2.5, Sam Houston State +2.5, Pitt +2, Toledo +1.5
Down: App State -4, Syracuse -2, Washington State -2, Houston -2.5, Coastal Carolina -2, Kent State -2, Akron -1.5, North Carolina -3, NC State -1.5, Minnesota -2, Ball State -1.5, Utah State -3, Rice -3, Virginia Tech -3, Kansas State -2.5, Colorado State -1, Baylor -2, Southern Miss -3, Purdue -2, Auburn -2.5, TCU -3.5, Oklahoma -1, Tulane -2, Wyoming -3, Missouri -4, USC -2, LSU -1.5, Mississippi State -4.5, Texas A&M -2, Memphis -4, Florida Atlantic -2.5, Tulsa -2, Middle Tennessee -2.5, New Mexico State -2.5, FIU -2, Oklahoma State -2.5, Florida State -1.5, Western Kentucky -1.5, Northern Illinois -2
Some notes on the biggest movers:
Navy +5: My market line was way off on Navy/Memphis last week, especially with how the game played out. I made adjustments to both, though my Navy line is still a little short this week, so I guess I haven’t gone far enough.
BYU +4: I had to make an adjustment because of what happened in that game and with their full body of work, but let’s be careful with adjusting too much on BYU. The Cougars were +3 in TO margin, ran back a fumble and a punt for a touchdown, and also benefited from three turnovers on downs from K-State. BYU only ran 48 plays and had 5.6 yards per play. It wasn’t the box score blowout that the final score indicated.
Texas Tech +3.5: Even in the loss to Wazzu, Texas Tech had a ton of yardage, but just didn’t turn it into points. I will say, like BYU, their box score was a touch misleading here and they only had 4.2 yards per play against Arizona State. I’m just making a market correction more than anything.
Louisiana +3.5: Same thing here. Market correction. Tulane was my favorite play of the week last week and they did win by 8, which is exactly where I had the game lined. I don’t think my Tulane power rating was the reason for the big discrepancy. I think it was my Louisiana one.
South Alabama +3: As I said, there were some teams I wanted to fade coming into the season that haven’t worked out. South Alabama appears to be one of them. They took an App State team I really liked out to the woodshed.
Temple +3: Temple is way better than I expected them to be. They’re still not good, but they’re quite a bit better than I thought they’d be.
Miami (FL) +3: Miami will get tested at some point, but they look awesome right now. Cam Ward is doing work in Coral Gables.
Mississippi State -4.5: Good lord, things are bad in Starkvegas. Mike Leach’s team would never have looked this bad, but it sure would’ve been interesting to hear one of his press conferences if he had a team like this one.
App State -4: Fart noise.
Memphis -4: Like I said, major market correction needed to Memphis after the Navy debacle. Based on my line this week against MTSU, I’m still a little high. That said, I’d lay it with Memphis this week. MTSU is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad.
Missouri -4: I think I’ve neglected how pedestrian Missouri has looked this season. I feel like they were a decent bit better than Boston College last week and didn’t punish them very much. That was not a good performance against Vanderbilt over the weekend. A Vandy team that lost to Georgia State the week prior.
TCU -3.5: Market correction, bad performances. I will say, there is a big yards per play discrepancy here on the plus side for the Horned Frogs, so I’m curious to see if maybe they figure it all out.
North Carolina -3: Giving up a 70 burger to anybody is a really bad look. Giving it up to a retooled James Madison squad is quite nauseating. I was really wrong about this team.
Utah State -3: Maybe Temple is just much improved, but Utah State looked quite poor going cross-country. I may have underestimated just how much of an issue losing Blake Anderson before the season seems to be.
Here are my Week 5 College Football Lines
Date | Away Team | Home Team | Line |
9/26 | Army | Temple | +10.5 |
9/27 | Virginia Tech | Miami (FL) | -16.5 |
Washington | Rutgers | -4 | |
9/28 | Eastern Michigan | Kent State | +11.5 |
Liberty | App State | +1.5 | |
UTSA | East Carolina | -2.5 | |
Stanford | Clemson | -23 | |
Georgia Southern | Georgia State | +1.5 | |
Northern Illinois | NC State | -4 | |
San Diego State | Central Michigan | +4.5 | |
Louisiana | Wake Forest | -1 | |
Ball State | James Madison | -17.5 | |
North Carolina | Duke | -1.5 | |
Akron | Ohio | -10.5 | |
Maryland | Indiana | -8.5 | |
Buffalo | UConn | -2 | |
UMass | Miami (OH) | -19.5 | |
Colorado | UCF | -11 | |
Western Michigan | Marshall | -4 | |
Old Dominion | Bowling Green | -10.5 | |
Western Kentucky | Boston College | -13 | |
Nebraska | Purdue | +9.5 | |
Florida State | SMU | -3.5 | |
Kentucky | Mississippi | -19 | |
Oklahoma State | Kansas State | -6.5 | |
Cincinnati | Texas Tech | -7 | |
TCU (Arrowhead Stadium) | Kansas (1 pt HFA) | -2 | |
South Florida | Tulane | -6 | |
Arizona | Utah | -9 | |
Washington State | Boise State | -10 | |
Texas State (NRG Stadium) | Sam Houston State (N) | +4.5 | |
Navy | UAB | -0.5 | |
Middle Tennessee | Memphis | -28.5 | |
Mississippi State | Texas | -37 | |
BYU | Baylor | +2.5 | |
South Alabama | LSU | -22.5 | |
Iowa State | Houston | +15 | |
Charlotte | Rice | -10.5 | |
Oklahoma | Auburn | +3.5 | |
Louisiana Monroe | Troy | -4.5 | |
Tulsa | North Texas | -6 | |
Fresno State | UNLV | -4 | |
Oregon | UCLA | +19.5 | |
Arkansas (N) | Texas A&M (AT&T Stadium) | -5 | |
Louisville | Notre Dame | -6.5 | |
Illinois | Penn State | -18.5 | |
Minnesota | Michigan | -10 | |
Wisconsin | USC | -14 | |
Louisiana Tech | FIU | +3 | |
Georgia | Alabama | +3 | |
New Mexico | New Mexico State | +2 | |
Ohio State | Michigan State | +23 | |
Air Force | Wyoming | +1 |
Some games to consider based on the differences between the betting market and my lines
Rutgers -2.5 (-4) vs. Washington: If your power ratings are good, and hopefully mine are, the gaps between your numbers and the market should be getting smaller. Key numbers aren’t quite as important in college with more possessions and more variance, but this is one where it’s under 3 and I have to look long and hard at it, especially with the qualitative factors of a short week and long travel.
San Diego State -4.5 (PK) at Central Michigan: The Chippewas were a fade for me last week with Ball State and that came through. Will they be a fade again this week? San Diego State looks awful, but I think CMU is rather bad as well.
Texas Tech -4 (-7) vs. Cincinnati: I guess I’ll find out right away if bumping Texas Tech in my PRs was the right call. Without my adjustment for this week, my line is 3.5. It’s nice to find out right away sometimes.
Arizona +12.5 (+9) at Utah: I don’t know if Cam Rising will play. Nobody does. What I do know is that Arizona off of a bye is intriguing and that I think they were downgraded a little too much by the market for the Northern Arizona game and the Kansas State loss.
Sam Houston State +8 (+4.5) vs. Texas State: A neutral-site game here at NRG Stadium, home of the Texans. I’ve upgraded Sam Houston State a lot the last couple of weeks because the betting market seemed to have a more optimistic outlook than I originally did. Maybe I upgraded one too many weeks. Maybe I have Texas State too low. I guess we’ll find out.
BYU +2.5 (-2.5) at Baylor: I had Baylor as a road favorite against Colorado last week. Now I have BYU as a road favorite at Baylor. It seems I don’t have a good handle on the Bears. That said, they were very close to winning in Boulder and I think my number was okay on that game.
Rice -6.5 (-10.5) vs. Charlotte: I was way off on the Rice/Army line last week and this may just be a continuation of that. That being said, Charlotte’s atrocious and I think I have that correctly pegged in my power ratings.
Louisiana Monroe +8.5 (+4.5) vs. Troy: Monroe’s been good to me so far this season, as they crushed UAB in a spot where I had a big line discrepancy. I like them in this one, too. This is probably my favorite power ratings play of the week.
New Mexico State +7 (+2) vs. New Mexico: I think I just don’t have a handle on either one of these teams with new coaches and a lot of new players. Also, New Mexico lost 38-21 last week, but had 485 yards of offense. I won’t be betting this game because I probably just don’t have these teams rated properly, but it is an interesting game.
I’ll be posting this weekly Power Ratings update all season long, including my lines on the games. Keep it locked in right here at VSiN and bookmark our weekly College Football Hub to get all of our written content every week during CFB season.