Week 9 College Football Power Ratings:
It is an interesting time of the college football season. Coaches are getting fired, teams know where they stand, and what we see is probably more predictive of what we’re going to get the rest of the way. At least you would think so, given that we’re now through eight weeks of the season and every team has played at least six games.
Some teams have had their goals shifted. Making a bowl game is the best that some programs can do at this point, while others are surprising candidates for something more. Others are not going to meet their expectations and you wonder about the mindsets of those coaches and players as things progress forward.
***Top College Football Betting Resources***
*It's the VSiN Black Friday Special. Take advantage of the largest savings of the year by upgrading to VSiN Pro. For a limited time, you can secure Pro access until May 1st for only $60.*
- NCAAF Expert Picks
- NCAAF Betting Hub
- NCAAF 2024 Week-By-Week Schedule
- Parlay Calculator
- NCAAF Betting Splits
- NCAAF Betting Odds
One thing I do want to address here is weather. These are raw power ratings based off of adjustments to my numbers on Sunday. No forecast is going to be reliable that far out, except for maybe the Tuesday night games. I’m not taking any of that stuff into account. These are just my valuations of teams and I go from there with my handicapping process, including adjusting for high or low totals and other parts of the qualitative handicap.
Be sure to check weather forecasts regularly. We’re reaching the point of the year when precipitation and wind can be much larger factors. Given some of the unique travel situations as a result of realignment, we could get some more games affected by the conditions than normal. We often take the weather for granted in September and early October, just assuming everything is copacetic. That may not be the case going forward.
One other thing I have noticed with my numbers this season is that they are disproportionately pointing me towards road favorites. I’m not entirely sure why. I don’t think my home-field calculations are that far off of the market and it shouldn’t lead to more than a disparity of maybe a couple of points if they are. It’s something I will look to correct on the fly this season and account for better next season.
Here are my Week 9 College Football Power Ratings
Rank | Team | PR | HFA |
1 | Georgia | 93 | 3 |
2 | Ohio State | 91 | 3.5 |
3 | Texas | 90 | 3.5 |
4 | Clemson | 88.5 | 3 |
5 | Oregon | 88.5 | 3.5 |
6 | Mississippi | 84.5 | 3.5 |
7 | Alabama | 83.5 | 3.5 |
8 | Notre Dame | 83.5 | 3.5 |
9 | LSU | 83 | 3.5 |
10 | Miami (Florida) | 83 | 2 |
11 | Penn State | 83 | 3.5 |
12 | Tennessee | 82.5 | 3.5 |
13 | SMU | 81 | 3.5 |
14 | Indiana | 80.5 | 1.5 |
15 | Iowa State | 80.5 | 2 |
16 | Texas A&M | 79.5 | 3 |
17 | Kansas State | 78.5 | 3.5 |
18 | Boise State | 77.5 | 2.5 |
19 | BYU | 76.5 | 2 |
20 | Iowa | 76 | 2.5 |
21 | South Carolina | 76 | 2.5 |
22 | Washington | 76 | 2 |
23 | Florida | 75.5 | 2 |
24 | Virginia Tech | 75.5 | 2 |
25 | Wisconsin | 75.5 | 2 |
26 | Missouri | 75 | 2 |
27 | Louisville | 74.5 | 3.5 |
28 | USC | 74.5 | 2 |
29 | Army | 73.5 | 2 |
30 | Auburn | 73.5 | 2 |
31 | Kentucky | 73.5 | 2.5 |
32 | Tulane | 73.5 | 2 |
33 | Michigan | 73 | 3.5 |
34 | California | 72.5 | 2 |
35 | Colorado | 72.5 | 2 |
36 | Nebraska | 72.5 | 2 |
37 | Arkansas | 71.5 | 2 |
38 | Cincinnati | 71.5 | 2 |
39 | UNLV | 71.5 | 2 |
40 | Pittsburgh | 71 | 2 |
41 | TCU | 71 | 2.5 |
42 | Georgia Tech | 70.5 | 1 |
43 | Michigan State | 70.5 | 2.5 |
44 | UCF | 70.5 | 3 |
45 | Virginia | 70.5 | 2 |
46 | Baylor | 70 | 2 |
47 | Navy | 70 | 2 |
48 | Oklahoma State | 70 | 3.5 |
49 | Washington State | 70 | 2.5 |
50 | Minnesota | 69.5 | 2 |
51 | Oklahoma | 69.5 | 3.5 |
52 | West Virginia | 69.5 | 3 |
53 | Arizona State | 69 | 2 |
54 | Illinois | 69 | 2 |
55 | Arizona | 68.5 | 2 |
56 | Texas Tech | 68.5 | 2.5 |
57 | Vanderbilt | 68 | 1 |
58 | Kansas | 67.5 | 2 |
59 | North Carolina | 67.5 | 2.5 |
60 | Utah | 67.5 | 3.5 |
61 | Maryland | 67 | 2 |
62 | Syracuse | 67 | 2.5 |
63 | James Madison | 66.5 | 3.5 |
64 | Memphis | 66.5 | 2 |
65 | Louisiana-Lafayette | 65.5 | 3 |
66 | Texas State | 65.5 | 2 |
67 | Boston College | 65 | 1.5 |
68 | North Carolina State | 64.5 | 3.5 |
69 | Northwestern | 63.5 | 1.5 |
70 | Western Kentucky | 63.5 | 2.5 |
71 | Duke | 63 | 3 |
72 | Florida State | 63 | 2 |
73 | Rutgers | 62.5 | 2 |
74 | UCLA | 62.5 | 2 |
75 | Jacksonville State | 61.5 | 2.5 |
76 | Mississippi State | 61.5 | 2 |
77 | Houston | 61 | 2 |
78 | Marshall | 61 | 2 |
79 | Oregon State | 61 | 3.5 |
80 | Wake Forest | 60.5 | 2.5 |
81 | Fresno State | 60 | 2.5 |
82 | Toledo | 60 | 2.5 |
83 | Georgia Southern | 59.5 | 2 |
84 | Old Dominion | 59.5 | 2 |
85 | South Alabama | 59 | 2.5 |
86 | Liberty | 58.5 | 3 |
87 | Northern Illinois | 58.5 | 1.5 |
88 | South Florida | 58.5 | 2 |
89 | North Texas | 58 | 2 |
90 | Appalachian State | 57.5 | 2.5 |
91 | Bowling Green | 57.5 | 2 |
92 | Nevada | 57.5 | 1.5 |
93 | Sam Houston State | 57.5 | 2 |
94 | Stanford | 57.5 | 1 |
95 | Coastal Carolina | 57 | 2.5 |
96 | Colorado State | 57 | 1 |
97 | Connecticut | 56.5 | 2 |
98 | Arkansas State | 56 | 2 |
99 | Miami (Ohio) | 56 | 3 |
100 | Purdue | 55.5 | 2 |
101 | New Mexico | 55 | 1 |
102 | East Carolina | 54 | 2 |
103 | UTSA | 54 | 3.5 |
104 | San Jose State | 53.5 | 2 |
105 | Western Michigan | 53.5 | 2 |
106 | Ohio | 53 | 2 |
107 | Utah State | 53 | 2 |
108 | Charlotte | 51.5 | 1 |
109 | Florida Atlantic | 51.5 | 2 |
110 | Rice | 51.5 | 2 |
111 | Troy | 51.5 | 2.5 |
112 | Georgia State | 51 | 2 |
113 | Louisiana-Monroe | 51 | 2 |
114 | Buffalo | 50.5 | 1 |
115 | Eastern Michigan | 50.5 | 2 |
116 | Hawai’i | 50 | 2 |
117 | Florida International | 49 | 1 |
118 | San Diego State | 49 | 2 |
119 | Central Michigan | 48.5 | 2 |
120 | Temple | 48 | 2 |
121 | Akron | 47.5 | 1 |
122 | Air Force | 47 | 2.5 |
123 | Wyoming | 47 | 2.5 |
124 | Louisiana Tech | 46.5 | 2 |
125 | Massachusetts | 46.5 | 1 |
126 | Southern Mississippi | 44.5 | 2 |
127 | Tulsa | 44.5 | 1 |
128 | UAB | 44 | 2.5 |
129 | UTEP | 41.5 | 2 |
130 | Middle Tennessee | 40.5 | 2 |
131 | Ball State | 40 | 2 |
132 | Kent State | 37.5 | 2 |
133 | New Mexico State | 36.5 | 2.5 |
134 | Kennesaw State | 32.5 | 2 |
Here are this week’s Power Ratings adjustments:
Up: Troy +2.5, Western Kentucky +2, FIU +3, Virginia Tech +2, Marshall +2, Nevada +1, UCF +2, Wake Forest +1.5, Temple +2, Old Dominion +2, Navy +2, Virginia +1.5, Kansas State +1, Baylor +4, Kent State +2, South Carolina +2, Wisconsin +3, NC State +3, SMU +2, LSU +2, Georgia +2, Oregon State +2.5, Michigan State +2, Southern Miss +1, Georgia Southern +2, Ball State +1, Washington +3, TCU +2, Louisiana Monroe +2, Mississippi State +3, Colorado State +2
Down: Kennesaw State -2, Louisiana Tech -1.5, Boston College -3, Georgia State -3, Florida State -4, Louisville -2, Tulsa -4, Texas State -2, Alabama -2, Georgia Tech -2.5, Arizona State -1, West Virginia -3, Memphis -2, Texas Tech -5, Bowling Green -1.5, Oklahoma -4, Rutgers -5, USC -3.5, Michigan -2, Utah -6, Texas -2, Nebraska -4, Sam Houston State -2.5, Pitt -2.5, Northern Illinois -2, East Carolina -3, South Alabama -3, Arkansas -5, Stanford -3, Fresno State -2, Iowa -3
Some notes on the biggest movers:
Baylor +4: Way, way, way off on the Baylor/Texas Tech game last week. My line was 10. Market closed 4.5 or 5. Baylor dropped 59 points. Texas Tech comes up later.
NC State +3: NC State may not have deserved the win over Cal, but this team is definitely better than it was early in the season. Second straight week I’ve given them a good bump.
FIU +3: Seems like Mike MacIntyre is making a little bit of progress with these guys.
Wisconsin +3: Speaking of making progress, Wisconsin has been playing extremely well for a while now, even with Tyler Van Dyke out.
Mississippi State +3: It seems like I got too low on this team early in the season as well and had to make a correction to catch up with the market.
Washington +3: I still don’t know what to think of this team. My Washington/Indiana line was off substantially before I peeled back another Hoosiers bump because of the Kurtis Rourke injury. Maybe the loss of Rourke warrants an adjustment on Indiana, but Tayven Jackson and Justice Ellison both looked pretty damn interesting.
Utah -6: Man, things are bad in Salt Lake City. This was a team that should’ve been in great shape to win the Big 12. Now I’d consider them a dog to make a bowl.
Texas Tech -5: The aforementioned Texas Tech drop. The market felt like a set of skeptics about this team. I saw why last week.
Rutgers -5: The market has also been very clear regarding its position on Rutgers and it is not favorable. Tons of money poured in on UCLA last week and that money was correct. Losing outright at home to the Bruins is a very bad look.
Arkansas -5: It seems as though I was slow to adjust on Arkansas. It’s really hard with these mid-tier teams in major conferences because they have the talent to do good things some weeks, but don’t do it or play awful in others.
Florida State -4: The Seminoles actually had a really good defensive effort against Duke, but the offense is just offensive.
Tulsa -4: This team is baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad.
Nebraska -4: I took Nebraska last week after looking at Indiana’s strength of schedule. I conveniently pushed my own narrative to ignore Nebraska’s. Oops. Correction made.
Oklahoma -4: Things are not good in Norman. This is a decent defense, but the offense is a complete and total disaster.
Here are my Week 9 College Football Lines
Date | Away Team | Home Team | Line |
10/22 | Sam Houston State | FIU | +7.5 |
UTEP | Louisiana Tech | -7 | |
10/23 | Liberty | Kennesaw State | +24 |
Middle Tennessee | Jacksonville State | -23.5 | |
10/24 | Syracuse | Pitt | -6 |
Georgia Southern | Old Dominion | -2 | |
10/25 | Louisville | Boston College | +8 |
Rutgers | USC | -14 | |
Boise State | UNLV | +4 | |
10/26 | Bowling Green | Toledo | -5 |
Florida State | Miami (FL) | -22 | |
BYU | UCF | +3 | |
North Carolina | Virginia | -5 | |
Eastern Michigan | Akron | +2 | |
Southern Miss | James Madison | -25.5 | |
Northern Illinois | Ball State | +16.5 | |
Georgia Tech | Virginia Tech | -7 | |
Buffalo | Ohio | -4.5 | |
Georgia State | App State | -9 | |
Kent State | Western Michigan | -18 | |
SMU | Duke | +15 | |
Central Michigan | Miami (OH) | -10.5 | |
Temple | East Carolina | -8 | |
Auburn | Kentucky | -2.5 | |
Rice | UConn | -7 | |
Notre Dame | Navy (N – Meadowlands) | +13.5 | |
Troy | Arkansas State | -6.5 | |
Michigan State | Michigan | -6 | |
Maryland | Minnesota | -4.5 | |
Washington | Indiana | -6 | |
Texas Tech | TCU | -5 | |
Louisiana Monroe | South Alabama | -10.5 | |
LSU | Texas A&M | +0.5 | |
Utah | Houston | +4.5 | |
Oklahoma | Mississippi | -18.5 | |
Oklahoma State | Baylor | -2 | |
Tulane | North Texas | +13.5 | |
Missouri | Alabama | -12 | |
Charlotte | Memphis | -17 | |
Texas | Vanderbilt | +21 | |
Kansas | Kansas State | -14.5 | |
Arkansas | Mississippi State | +8 | |
UTSA | Tulsa | +8.5 | |
Cincinnati | Colorado | -3 | |
New Mexico | Colorado State | -3 | |
Utah State | Wyoming | +3.5 | |
West Virginia | Arizona | -1 | |
Oregon State | Cal | -13.5 | |
Washington State | San Diego State | +19 | |
San Jose State | Fresno State | -9 | |
Wake Forest | Stanford | +2 | |
Penn State | Wisconsin | +5.5 | |
Northwestern | Iowa | -15 | |
Nebraska | Ohio State | -22 | |
Illinois | Oregon | -23 | |
Nevada | Hawaii | +5.5 |
Some games to consider based on the differences between the betting market and my lines
Toledo -3 (-5) vs. Bowling Green: Rivalry game here. Bowling Green has been dropping rather quickly in my power ratings of late. It’s not a big edge and there are no key numbers, but the Falcons are kind of in a prove-it spot to me.
Northern Illinois -11.5 (-16.5) at Ball State: This is what I’m talking about. I keep getting ugly road favorites as games with overlays. I do have some very low home-field advantages on teams like Ball State, but not “be off by five points” low. I also find the Ball State activity, both on and against, rather odd this season.
SMU -11 (-15) at Duke: Another one with a road favorite the makes the list. Maybe a fundamental flaw. Maybe a low rating on Duke, which was the case last week against Florida State. But, the Blue Devils really haven’t impressed me at all this season.
LSU +3 (-0.5) at Texas A&M: The road theme again. I do really think LSU is in better form than Texas A&M right now, though. And the Aggies definitely have my respect from a HFA standpoint based on the definition I use.
Tulane -8 (-13.5) at North Texas: Yeah, another one. Like I said, I think I’m flawed somewhere. That being said, North Texas is still really bad on defense and I think Tulane’s a very good team.
Kansas State -10 (-14.5) vs. Kansas: Hey, a home team! Kansas has been on my fade list all season. I’ll do it again here.
New Mexico +6 (+3) at Colorado State: A road dog this time at least. I haven’t been able to nail down Colorado State at any point this season. This is another example. And I’ve been wrong with most examples, so I’m treading lightly.
Nevada -2.5 (-5.5) at Hawaii: I’ve also noticed a lot of road favorites in the G5 conferences. This is another one. Washington State is as well. I’ll do some digging and hopefully figure it out.
I’ll be posting this weekly Power Ratings update all season long, including my lines on the games. Keep it locked in right here at VSiN and bookmark our weekly College Football Hub to get all of our written content every week during CFB season.