The following NBA betting trends are a collection of analytical data, betting systems and strength ratings featured on VSiN and qualified for the NBA First Round Game Threes. This report is meant to emulate the process that Steve Makinen and other members of the VSiN Analytics team undergo when handicapping each day’s NBA board.

 

AI’s Takes of the Day

Following Bill Adee’s lead from recent VSiN newsletters, I’ve decided to run these reports through an online AI service to get that perspective. AI’s record starting January 30th: 82-69-3 (54.3%). Here are today’s results:

– NEW YORK (-1 at DET)
Two DK Betting Splits systems, a #3 seed playoff post-loss trend, and recent head-to-head trend all favor NYK + line range playoff trend fades DET 

– MILWAUKEE (-5 vs. IND)
DK Betting Splits system #4, first round Game Three playoff trend, scheduling situation, and recent head-to-head trend all favor MIL + multiple playoff trends fade IND 

AJ’s Angles

These are the top NBA betting trends and systems for today’s games, handpicked by VSiN Analyst AJ Makinen.

* LA CLIPPERS are 29-11 Under the total since 2020-21 when playing at home on 2 Days Rest
Trend Match (PLAY UNDER): DEN-LAC (o/u at 212.5) 

* Favorites are 11-0 SU and 10-1 ATS in the last 11 of NYK-DET head-to-head series in Detroit
Trend Match (PLAY): NEW YORK (-1 at DET) 

* Teams having won their last four games or more have been a solid wager when playing as large road favorites of 7.5 points or more, going 75-18 SU and 52-38-3 ATS (57.8%) since the start of the 2020-21 season.
System Match (PLAY): OKLAHOMA CITY (-9.5 at MEM) 

* Game Three home teams in the +4 to -4 line range are currently on a brutal skid of 8-19 SU and 7-19-1 ATS (26.9%) since 2017.
System Matches (FADE ALL): DETROIT (+1 vs. NYK), MINNESOTA (-3 vs. LAL), GOLDEN STATE (-3.5 vs. HOU) 

* Under the total was 60-24 (71.4%) over the last three seasons when the home team was on One Day Rest and the road team was playing a 3rd in 8+ Days game.
System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): OKC-MEM (o/u at 227), BOS-ORL (o/u at 197.5) 

Strategies Using NBA DraftKings Betting Splits Data

One of the most touted features on the VSiN.com website, and a feature that we believe to be a fantastic resource for bettors is the betting splits pages. These are the pages that we have built utilizing the data that DraftKings so graciously provides to us, detailing the breakdowns of the money and ticket splits for point spreads, money lines, and totals. 

In an article published on the VSiN.com website on opening day, Steve Makinen outlined 14 different systematic strategies for successfully using the DK Betting Splits Data that was developed in the last two seasons. Here are the systems and qualifying plays for Game Three as of 12:30 PM ET (on Thursday, April 24). These can and will change, so continue to track and qualify the systems up until tip-off for best usage.

To summarize the findings from the first half data of the 2024-25 season, the sample contained 638 games, and for the most part, to summarize, majority handle bettors were much more successful than majority number of bets groups on point spreads and totals, while majority bets groups were far superior on money lines. In fact, these were the results:

– Majority handle on point spreads: 317-295 ATS (51.8%), -7.5 units – ROI: -1.2%
– Majority number of bets on point spreads: 288-317 ATS (47.6%), -60.7 units – ROI: -10%
– Majority handle on money lines: 395-238 (62.4%). -103.17 units – ROI: -16.3%
– Majority number of bets on money lines: 442-188 (70.2%). -11.09 units – ROI: -1.8%
– Majority handle on totals: 332-295 (53.0%). +7.5 units – ROI: +1.2%
– Majority number of bets on totals: 314-309 (50.4%), -25.9 units – ROI: -4.2%

DK NBA Betting Splits system #1: When 63% or more of the handle was on the side of a home team playing as a four-point favorite or less (or as an underdog) on ATS wager, this “super” majority group has gone 129-109 ATS (54.2%) over the last 2+ seasons. This is a fairly profitable system that the public seems to get right consistently.  If you see nearly 2/3 of the handle backing a host in an expected competitive NBA game this season, it’s a solid bet to follow it.
System Match (PLAY): MINNESOTA 

DK NBA Betting Splits system #2: When 59% or more of the handle has been on the road side of an ATS wager, this “super” majority group has gone 616-546 ATS (53%) over the two seasons. This has been a very consistent system since I first found it, and for its simplicity, fairly successful. Remember, handle is the total amount of money on a game. When a good portion of the overall money is on a road team in the NBA, it wins more often than not.
System Matches (PLAY ALL): NEW YORK, OKLAHOMA CITY, BOSTON, CLEVELAND, HOUSTON 

DK NBA Betting Splits system #4: In another somewhat rare situation, when there was a majority handle backing the team with fewer wins on the season in the NBA over the last 2+ seasons, that group produced a 258-207 ATS record (55.5%). This lot of 465 games was only around 20% of the total sample size.
System Matches (PLAY ALL): MILWAUKEE, MINNESOTA 

DK NBA Betting Splits system #7: The number 63% or higher has been a key super-majority number in non-divisional conference games over the last 2+ seasons, with handle groups of that size boasting a 390-334 ATS record, good for 53.9%. This is another near 3% improvement on the overall majority figures.
System Matches (PLAY ALL): NEW YORK, OKLAHOMA CITY, BOSTON, MINNESOTA, CLEVELAND, HOUSTON 

DK NBA Betting Splits system #8: Naturally, with super majority handles doing well on non-conference and non-divisional conference games as compared to the overall, the area where these groups would figure to struggle would be in divisional games. The super-majority number is a little higher, however, 67% in fact. When this super-majority number has backed a team in divisional games over the last 2+ seasons, they are just 105-120 ATS, good for 46.7%. This is over a 5% dropoff compared to the overall majority figures.
System Match (FADE): MILWAUKEE 

DK NBA Betting Splits system #10: Majority handle money line wagerers have struggled in each of the last two playoff seasons, with handle majorities going 97-76 for -33.6 units and an ROI of -19.4%. Compare this to the usual ML return of -5.2%, and you can see bettors are losing on a lot of favorite plays. This system will be significant starting in April.
System Matches (FADE ALL): NEW YORK ML, OKLAHOMA CITY ML, DENVER ML, BOSTON ML, MILWAUKEE ML, LA LAKERS ML, CLEVELAND ML, HOUSTON ML 

These last three systems involve totals. 

DK NBA Betting Splits system #12: One of the best, simplest, and most frequent angles I have been able to uncover is when a majority of handle bettors were backing the Under in an NBA game. I told you earlier that most NBA bettors love taking Overs. When any majority number have favored the Under option over the last 2+ seasons, the results have been strong, with Under the total on these games going 349-280, good for 55.5%, +41 units, and an ROI of +6.5% since January ’23.
System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): DEN-LAC, LAL-MIN, CLE-MIA, HOU-GSW 

DK NBA Betting Splits system #13: There has been some decent success for number of bets majorities when they don’t get too heavily invested. In fact, majorities on either side of the total (Over or Under) of 57% or less have gone 282-242 (53.8%) for +15.8 units and an ROI of +3% since January 2023.
System Matches (PLAY ALL): OVER – OKC-MEM, IND-MIL
UNDER – HOU-GSW 

DK NBA Betting Splits system #14: The average NBA game total since January of ’23 has been a touch under 228. In NBA games with “low” totals, or those less than 220, majority handle bettors have gone an impressive 304-266 (53.3%), while majority number of bets groups are a bit less at 304-270 (53.0%). Both groups have proven profitable regardless of which side of the total they have chosen.
System Matches (PLAY ALL): OVER – NYK-DET, BOS-ORL
UNDER – DEN-LAC, LAL-MIN, CLE-MIA, HOU-GSW

First Round Game Trends by Line/Total Range

• Big favorites have held a significant edge – Since the start of the 2014 playoffs, NBA first round favorites of 8.5 points or more are 95-14 SU and 66-43 ATS (60.6%).
System Match (PLAY): OKLAHOMA CITY (-9.5 at MEM) 

• Bigger road favorites are also a solid bet – Only 11 of the last 56 road favorites of 4.5 points or more have lost outright, going 45-11 SU and 37-18-1 ATS (67.3%).
System Matches (PLAY ALL): OKLAHOMA CITY (-9.5 at MEM), BOSTON (-5.5 at ORL), CLEVELAND (-6 at MIA) 

• First round home favorites of four points or less have proven to be a bad investment lately, as since 2014, they are just 44-37 SU and 34-46-1 ATS (42.5%).
System Matches (FADE ALL): MINNESOTA (-3 vs. LAL), GOLDEN STATE (-3.5 vs. HOU) 

• The last three NBA first round playoffs saw 70 Unders, 58 Overs, 1 Push– (57%). This year, they are 11-5 to the Under (68.8%).
System Matches: PLAY UNDER IN ALL EIGHT GAMES 

• With the meteoric rise in scoring over the last few years in the NBA, it is interesting to note that in the lowest totaled first round playoff games over the last five postseasons, 218 or less, Under the total is 76-52-4 (59.4%). In all games with totals above 218, Over the total is 73-64-2 (53.3%).
System Matches (PLAY ALL): OVER – OKC-MEM, IND-MIL
UNDER – NYK-DET, DEN-LAC, BOS-ORL, LAL-MIN, CLE-MIA, HOU-GSW

Last Game Trends

• Home teams are a better wager when coming off a win in a series – Home teams coming off a win in the prior game of a series are 83-48 SU and 67-64 ATS (51.1%) since 2016. Those coming off a loss are 88-71 SU and 74-82-3 ATS (47.4%) in that same span. Naturally, the latter are often the lower-seeded team in a series, but this 3.7% ATS swing is a good indication of how momentum aids a team.
System Matches (FADE ALL ATS): MEMPHIS (+9.5 vs. OKC), ORLANDO (+5.5 vs. BOS), MILWAUKEE (-5 vs. IND), MINNESOTA (-3 vs. LAL), MIAMI (+6 vs. CLE), GOLDEN STATE (-3.5 vs. HOU) 

• Blowout losses carry over – There is a bit of a misconception when it comes to teams “bouncing back” from rough first round losses. In fact, teams that lost their previous game by 12 points or more are just 64-122 SU and 76-108-2 ATS (41.3%) in the next contest since 2013. This year, they are 1-4 SU and 3-2 ATS.
System Matches (FADE ALL ATS): MEMPHIS (+9.5 vs. OKC), GOLDEN STATE (-3.5 vs. HOU) 

• Heartbreaking losses have a galvanizing effect – Teams that lose close games, or those decided by 3 points or less, in the first round of the NBA playoffs have bounced back with a 40-16 SU and 36-18-2 ATS (66.7%) mark in the next game since 2014. In the line range of +5 to -5, these teams are on an amazing 25-7 SU and 22-8-2 ATS (73.3%) surge!
System Match (PLAY): DENVER (+5.5 at LAC) 

• Teams that shoot 40% or less from the floor in a first round game have been lousy bets in the next contest, going 54-78-3 ATS (40.9%) since 2014.
System Match (FADE): MINNESOTA (-3 vs. LAL) 

• Beware of teams that shoot the 3pt shot well in one game but still lose. Those that shot 40.0% or better on 3-point shots but still lost have gone just 18-33-1 ATS (35.3%) in the next contest since 2016 in the first round.
System Matches (FADE ALL): DENVER (+5.5 at LAC), MILWAUKEE (-5 vs. IND)

First Round Trends by Game Number

• First round Game Three home teams are just 15-25 SU and 16-24 ATS (40%) since 2019.
System Matches: FADE ALL EIGHT HOME TEAMS 

• The better Game Three home teams are those coming off a win in game 2. They are 11-10 SU and 9-12 ATS (42.9%) in their last 21 tries, while those that lost in Game Two are on an 11-20 SU and 13-18 ATS (41.9%) skid.
System Matches (FADE ALL): MEMPHIS (+9.5 vs. OKC), ORLANDO (+5.5 vs. BOS), MILWAUKEE (-5 vs. IND), MINNESOTA (-3 vs. LAL), MIAMI (+6 vs. CLE), GOLDEN STATE (-3.5 vs. HOU)

• Game Three point spreads most often tell the story, as hosts of 4.5 points or more are on a 16-2 SU and 14-4 ATS (77.8%) stretch since 2013, while home dogs of 4.5-points or more are just 3-17 SU and 7-12-1 ATS (36.8%) in that same span.
System Matches: PLAY – LA CLIPPERS (-5.5 vs DEN), MILWAUKEE (-5 vs IND)
FADE – MEMPHIS (+9.5 vs OKC), ORLANDO (+5.5 vs BOS), MIAMI (+6 vs CLE) 

• Since you’re probably wondering at this point, Game Three home teams in the +4 to -4 line range are currently on a brutal skid of 8-19 SU and 7-19-1 ATS (26.9%) since 2017.
System Matches (FADE ALL): DETROIT (+1 vs. NYK), MINNESOTA (-3 vs. LAL), GOLDEN STATE (-3.5 vs. HOU)

Trends by Seed Number

• #2 seeds have been crazy good as bigger chalk – #2 seeded teams are on a strong run of 71-16 SU and 54-33 ATS (62.1%) when favored by 4.5 points or more.
System Match (PLAY): BOSTON (-5.5 at ORL)

• #3 seeds bounce back on the road after losses – Third-seeded teams are on a run of 11-6 SU and 13-4 ATS (76.5%) on the road after losing the prior game in a first round series.
System Match (PLAY): NEW YORK (-1 at DET) 

• #4 seeds have been brutal in Games Three and Four, with a 15-33 SU and 17-30-1 ATS (36.2%) record in such games of their first round series since 2013.
System Matches (FADE ALL): DENVER (+5.5 at LAC), INDIANA (+5 at MIL) 

• #4 seeds have tended to stack losses, as they are just 28-34 SU and 22-40 ATS (35.5%) since 2013 in same series games following a loss.
System Match (FADE): DENVER (+5.5 at LAC)

• Success in first round games comes with topping the 117-point mark, as teams that have scored 118 points or more are on a 119-28 SU and 117-30 ATS (79.6%) run over the last six postseasons.

• In terms of points allowed, 99 points is the key benchmark. Teams that have allowed 98 points or fewer in the last six first round playoff seasons are 103-18 SU and 100-19-2 ATS (84%). 

Schedule Situations Crucial for NBA Handicapping

The following is an expanded version of the article published in this year’s VSiN NBA Betting Guide, detailing scheduling situations in which teams have shown definitive patterns over the last few seasons. Typically, there are reasons that teams perform at varying levels based on their schedules, whether that be from the amount of rest they’ve gotten before a game, how fatigued they are from a string of games, or how they deal with injuries/workloads based on the schedule pressures.

We will be tracking 90 top scheduling situations all season long! 

* Home teams playing a 3rd in 8+ Days game are 92-66 SU and 87-68-3 ATS (56.1%) hosting road teams on One Day Rest over the last four seasons.
4/25: ORLANDO vs. Boston
System Match (PLAY): ORLANDO (+5.5 vs. BOS) 

* Home teams on One Day Rest are 60-53 SU and 61-49-3 ATS (55.5%) hosting teams playing on a 3rd Game in 8+ Days game over the last four seasons.
4/24: MEMPHIS vs. Oklahoma City
4/25: ORLANDO vs. Boston
System Matches (PLAY ALL): MEMPHIS (+9.5 vs. OKC), ORLANDO (+5.5 vs. BOS) 

* Home teams playing a 3rd in 8+ Days game are 43-19 SU and 39-20-3 ATS (66.1%) hosting teams playing a 2 Days Rest game over the last four seasons.
System Matches (PLAY ALL): DETROIT (+1 vs. NYK), LA CLIPPERS (-5.5 vs. DEN), MILWAUKEE (-5 vs. IND), MINNESOTA (-5 vs. LAL), MIAMI (+6 vs. CLE), GOLDEN STATE (-3.5 vs. HOU)

* Under the total was 84-65 (56.4%) over the last four seasons when one team was on 2 Days Rest and the opponent was playing a 3rd in 8+ Days game.
System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): NYK-DET (o/u at 213.5), DEN-LAC (o/u at 212.5), IND-MIL (o/u at 229.5), LAL-MIN (o/u at 205.5), CLE-MIA (o/u at 213), HOU-GSW (o/u at 203) 

* Under the total was 60-24 (71.4%) over the last three seasons when the home team was on One Day Rest and the road team was playing a 3rd in 8+ Days game.

* Under the total is on a 87-37-1 (70.2%) in the last 125 when one of the teams in a matchup was on a 4th Game in 10+ Days schedule scenario and the opponent was playing a One Day Rest game.
4/24: Under the total in OKLAHOMA CITY-MEMPHIS
4/25: Under the total in BOSTON-ORLANDO
System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): OKC-MEM (o/u at 227), BOS-ORL (o/u at 197.5) 

* Under the total was 120-72 (62.5%) since the start of last season when one of the teams in a matchup was on a 4th Game in 10+ Days schedule scenario and the opponent was playing a 3rd in 8+ Days game, in other words, two pretty rested teams.

* Under the total was 79-51 (60.8%) since the start of last season when both teams in an NBA matchup were in the same 3rd in 8+ Days game scenario…two rested teams.
System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): NYK-DET (o/u at 213.5), DEN-LAC (o/u at 212.5), BOS-ORL (o/u at 197.5), IND-MIL (o/u at 229.5), LAL-MIN (o/u at 205.5), HOU-GSW (o/u at 203) 

* LA CLIPPERS are 21-16 SU but 9-28 ATS in their last 37 games at home playing on 2 Days Rest
4/24: FADE LA CLIPPERS vs. Denver
Trend Match (FADE): LA CLIPPERS (-5.5 vs. DEN) 

* LA CLIPPERS are 29-11 Under the total since 2020-21 when playing at home on 2 Days Rest
4/24: Under the total in DENVER-LA CLIPPERS
Trend Match (PLAY UNDER): DEN-LAC (o/u at 212.5)

NBA Team Strength Systems

The following handicapping information details five NBA betting trend systems for teams based on various team strength indicators or line scenarios. Unless noted, these are from the last four NBA seasons. 

NBA Team Strength Betting System #1:
In games between two teams with 60%+ winning percentages, home teams favored in the -4.5 to -9.5 range are on a 149-54 SU and 121-81-1 ATS (59.9%) run.
System Match (PLAY): LA CLIPPERS (-5.5 vs. DEN) 

NBA Team Strength Betting System #5:
Double-digit NBA games have produced some definitive results on totals over the last four seasons, depending on the type of matchup it was. In divisional games featuring double-digit lines, Under the total has gone 112-90 (55.4%). In non-conference games, Over the total was 224-175 (56.1%). And finally, in non-divisional conference games, Over the total was 288-225 (56.1%).
System Match (PLAY OVER): OKC-MEM (*if it becomes a double-digit spread, -9.5 currently)

NBA Extreme Stats Next Game Systems

These systems search for extreme statistical performances in NBA games and detail the results of the follow-up game for the teams. These systems are from the last four seasons unless noted.

Favorites flush low-scoring totals quickly
NBA teams that come off a game in which they scored 90 points or fewer have responded well when favored in the next outing, going 151-56 SU and 122-83-2 ATS (59.5%) in their last 207 tries.
System Match (PLAY): MINNESOTA (-3 vs. LAL) 

Close wins haven’t provided momentum going forward
NBA teams that won as favorites by a close margin (1-3 points) have gone 277-146 SU but just 179-231-13 ATS (43.7%) in the next contest when favored again.
System Match (FADE): LA CLIPPERS (-5.5 vs. DEN) 

Unusual shooting performance systems
Similarly, NBA teams that have made 20 or more 3PT field goals in a game have struggled the next time out, going 338-308 SU but 291-335-18 ATS (46.5%) the next game over the last four seasons.
System Match (FADE): CLEVELAND (-6 at MIA) 

NBA road teams coming off a game in which they made 20+ 3-point shots have gone just 168-185 SU and 158-185-10 ATS (46.1%) in that next contest over the last six seasons.
System Match (FADE): CLEVELAND (-6 at MIA)

NBA Streak Systems

The following handicapping information details nine NBA betting trend systems for teams on winning or losing streaks of at least four games in the NBA.

NBA Streak Betting System #4:
Teams having won their last four games or more have been a solid wager when playing as large road favorites of 7.5 points or more, going 75-18 SU and 52-38-3 ATS (57.8%) since the start of the 2020-21 season.
System Match (PLAY): OKLAHOMA CITY (-9.5 at MEM) 

Game Three NBA Strength Ratings

The following NBA betting trends are taken from today’s MAKINEN DAILY RATINGS page under the NBA tab on VSiN.com. Listed by team, current line, and difference between rating and current line (in parentheses).

Game Three Top 3 UNDERPRICED UNDERDOGS according to the Makinen POWER RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. MEMPHIS +9.5 (+2.0)
2(tie). DETROIT +1 (+1.0)
INDIANA +5 (+1.0) 

Game Three Top 2 UNDERPRICED FAVORITES according to the Makinen POWER RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. BOSTON -5.5 (+1.0)
2. LA CLIPPERS -5.5 (+0.2) 

Game Three Top 3 UNDERPRICED UNDERDOGS according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. HOUSTON +3.5 (+5.0)
2. MEMPHIS +9.5 (+1.6)
3. DETROIT +1 (+1.2) 

Game Three Top 3 UNDERPRICED FAVORITES according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. BOSTON -5.5 (+1.6)
2. MINNESOTA -3 (+1.4)
3. CLEVELAND -6 (+1.0) 

Game Three Top 3 BIGGEST TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING OVER according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. LAL-MIN OVER 205.5 (+3.6)
2. DEN-LAC OVER 212.5 (+3.0)
3. CLE-MIA OVER 213 (+2.0) 

Game Three Top 3 BIGGEST TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING UNDER according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. NYK-DET UNDER 213.5 (-3.0)
2. IND-MIL UNDER 229.5 (-1.0)
3. BOS-ORL UNDER 197.5 (-0.6)

Game Three Top 3 UNDERPRICED UNDERDOGS according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. MEMPHIS +9.5 (+2.0)
2. DETROIT +1 (+1.6)
3. HOUSTON +3.5 (+1.1) 

Game Three Top 2 UNDERPRICED FAVORITES according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. BOSTON -5.5 (+0.8)
2. MINNESOTA -3 (+0.2) 

Game Three Top 3 BIGGEST TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING OVER according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. NYK-DET OVER 213.5 (+5.7)
2. DEN-LAC OVER 212.5 (+4.3)
3. LAL-MIN OVER 205.5 (+4.2) 

Game Three Top 2 BIGGEST TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING UNDER according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches:
1. IND-MIL UNDER 229.5 (-1.2)
2. OKC-MEM UNDER 227 (-0.8)

Here are the top head-to-head series NBA betting trends in play for all Game Threes:

Thursday, April 24, 2025

(545) OKLAHOMA CITY at (546) MEMPHIS
* OKLAHOMA CITY is 10-1 ATS in the last 11 head-to-head matchups with Memphis
Trend Match: PLAY OKLAHOMA CITY ATS

* Under the total is 10-2 in the last 12 of the MEM-OKC head-to-head series
Trend Match: PLAY UNDER the total 

(547) NEW YORK at (548) DETROIT
* Favorites are 11-0 SU and 10-1 ATS in the last 11 of the NYK-DET head-to-head series in Detroit
Trend Match: PLAY NEW YORK ATS 

(549) DENVER at (550) LA CLIPPERS
* Underdogs are 6-4 SU and 8-2 ATS in the last 10 of the LAC-DEN head-to-head series
Trend Match: PLAY DENVER ATS

Friday, April 25, 2025

(553) BOSTON at (554) ORLANDO
* Home teams are 9-0 SU and 8-1 ATS in the last nine of the ORL-BOS head-to-head series
Trend Match: PLAY ORLANDO ATS 

(555) INDIANA at (556) MILWAUKEE
* Favorites are 7-0 SU and 6-0-1 ATS in the last seven of the MIL-IND head-to-head divisional rivalry
Trend Match: PLAY MILWAUKEE ATS 

(557) LA LAKERS at (558) MINNESOTA
* Under the total has converted in six straight head-to-head meetings between MIN and LAL
Trend Match: PLAY UNDER the total

Saturday, April 26, 2025

(563) CLEVELAND at (564) MIAMI
* Over the total is 8-2 in the last 10 of the MIA-CLE head-to-head series
Trend Match: PLAY OVER the total 

(563) HOUSTON at (564) GOLDEN STATE
* Under the total has converted in six straight head-to-head meetings between HOU and GSW
Trend Match: PLAY UNDER the total

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR