Week 1 College Football Power Ratings:
Our first college football data points are in the books and Week 0 was a tremendous one for underdogs. Pups covered in all four games with an FBS team, including the two FBS vs. FBS games, which featured Georgia Tech as an outright winner and Nevada should have been one, too.
You don’t want to overreact to one game, as teams will play their best games and worst games at some point and it’s entirely possible that the first one falls under that criteria. That being said, you still want to be cognizant of the fact that you may have simply been wrong about a team for a variety of reasons.
***Top College Football Betting Resources***
*It's the VSiN Black Friday Special. Take advantage of the largest savings of the year by upgrading to VSiN Pro. For a limited time, you can secure Pro access until May 1st for only $60.*
- NCAAF Expert Picks
- NCAAF Betting Hub
- NCAAF 2024 Week-By-Week Schedule
- Parlay Calculator
- NCAAF Betting Splits
- NCAAF Betting Odds
Watching the games certainly helps, but there are only so many hours in the day, only so many TVs on the wall, and only so many games broadcast in your area. With that, here are my three steps to adjusting my power ratings.
1. Compare my line to the closing line
Football betting markets are very efficient. Early in the season, both sides of the counter are trying to figure things out, but we’re also both going to be making adjustments. The closing line is a barometer of how a pair of teams were valued going into the game.
2. Study the box score
The final score says a lot, but how we got to that point says a lot more to me. Georgia Tech held Florida State under 300 total yards (4.3 yards per play). There was nothing fluky about the Seminoles’ offensive performance. They didn’t have any turnovers, didn’t have a ton of penalties, and didn’t create many explosive plays. That is a major concern with all summer to prep for this one.
New Mexico gave up 362 rushing yards to an FCS team. While they covered wire-to-wire and probably should have won, they were badly outgained and mostly outplayed.
Things like that are a little bit more subjective when it comes to making an adjustment, but that’s the “art” to the “science” part. Were there a lot of red zone turnovers? Missed field goals? Drives that stalled just outside FG range? A long defensive TD? Those are some of the many things I’m looking for in the box score.
3. Look for injury information
Like I said, I can’t watch every game, but there are a lot of good resources out there to let me know if any key players got hurt. Sometimes we don’t get it right away and a mid-week adjustment will be necessary. For the purposes of this article, I’m not going to repost with each bit of info, so I’ll put up my ratings on Sunday or first thing Monday morning and that’ll be what we roll with.
Obviously this week and all future weeks will be chock full of updates and talking points. For now, just some small updates to the teams that played. I’m sticking with my preseason thoughts on the other 128 FBS teams. Also, I do NOT power-rate FCS, so I won’t have any lines on those games.
Here are my Week 1 College Football Power Ratings
Rank | Team | PR | HFA |
1 | Georgia | 95 | 3 |
2 | Ohio State | 93 | 3.5 |
3 | Oregon | 91.5 | 3.5 |
4 | Texas | 90 | 3.5 |
5 | Alabama | 89 | 3.5 |
6 | Mississippi | 86 | 3.5 |
7 | Notre Dame | 86 | 3.5 |
8 | LSU | 85 | 3.5 |
9 | Penn State | 84.5 | 3.5 |
10 | Michigan | 83 | 3.5 |
11 | Oklahoma | 83 | 3.5 |
12 | Missouri | 82 | 2 |
13 | Tennessee | 82 | 3.5 |
14 | Clemson | 81.5 | 3 |
15 | Texas A&M | 81.5 | 3 |
16 | Florida State | 81 | 2 |
17 | Kansas State | 79.5 | 3.5 |
18 | Utah | 79.5 | 3.5 |
19 | Miami (Florida) | 79 | 2 |
20 | USC | 78 | 2 |
21 | Arizona | 77 | 2 |
22 | Oklahoma State | 77 | 3.5 |
23 | Iowa State | 76.5 | 2 |
24 | Auburn | 76 | 2 |
25 | Kansas | 76 | 2 |
26 | Kentucky | 76 | 2.5 |
27 | Louisville | 76 | 3.5 |
28 | Virginia Tech | 75.5 | 2 |
29 | TCU | 75 | 2.5 |
30 | Washington | 75 | 2 |
31 | Iowa | 74.5 | 2.5 |
32 | Florida | 74 | 2 |
33 | North Carolina State | 74 | 3.5 |
34 | Wisconsin | 74 | 2 |
35 | SMU | 73.5 | 3.5 |
36 | South Carolina | 73 | 2.5 |
37 | UCF | 73 | 3 |
38 | West Virginia | 73 | 3 |
39 | Georgia Tech | 73 | 1 |
40 | Nebraska | 72.5 | 2 |
41 | Texas Tech | 72 | 2.5 |
42 | Boise State | 71.5 | 2.5 |
43 | Maryland | 71 | 2 |
44 | Memphis | 71 | 2 |
45 | North Carolina | 71 | 2.5 |
46 | UCLA | 71 | 2 |
47 | Colorado | 70 | 2 |
48 | Arkansas | 69 | 2 |
49 | California | 69 | 2 |
50 | Rutgers | 69 | 2 |
51 | Baylor | 68.5 | 2 |
52 | Liberty | 68.5 | 3 |
53 | Tulane | 68 | 2 |
54 | Appalachian State | 67.5 | 2.5 |
55 | Minnesota | 66.5 | 2 |
56 | Northwestern | 66.5 | 1.5 |
57 | Syracuse | 66.5 | 2.5 |
58 | Cincinnati | 66 | 2 |
59 | Oregon State | 66 | 3.5 |
60 | South Florida | 66 | 2 |
61 | UTSA | 66 | 3.5 |
62 | Washington State | 66 | 2.5 |
63 | Illinois | 65.5 | 2 |
64 | Pittsburgh | 65.5 | 2 |
65 | Virginia | 65.5 | 2 |
66 | BYU | 65 | 2 |
67 | Duke | 65 | 3 |
68 | Fresno State | 65 | 2.5 |
69 | Indiana | 65 | 1.5 |
70 | Michigan State | 65 | 2.5 |
71 | Mississippi State | 65 | 2 |
72 | Purdue | 65 | 2 |
73 | James Madison | 64 | 3.5 |
74 | Texas State | 64 | 2 |
75 | UNLV | 64 | 2 |
76 | Wake Forest | 64 | 2.5 |
77 | Arizona State | 63.5 | 2 |
78 | Houston | 63.5 | 2 |
79 | Stanford | 63.5 | 1 |
80 | Boston College | 63 | 1.5 |
81 | Wyoming | 62.5 | 2.5 |
82 | Louisiana-Lafayette | 61 | 3 |
83 | Arkansas State | 61 | 2 |
84 | Miami (Ohio) | 61 | 3 |
85 | Air Force | 60 | 2.5 |
86 | Troy | 60 | 2.5 |
87 | Western Kentucky | 60 | 2.5 |
88 | Bowling Green | 59 | 2 |
89 | Jacksonville State | 59 | 2.5 |
90 | Rice | 59 | 2 |
91 | Toledo | 59 | 2.5 |
92 | Coastal Carolina | 58 | 2.5 |
93 | Colorado State | 58 | 1 |
94 | San Diego State | 58 | 2 |
95 | South Alabama | 58 | 2.5 |
96 | Georgia Southern | 57.5 | 2 |
97 | Northern Illinois | 57.5 | 1.5 |
98 | East Carolina | 57 | 2 |
99 | Marshall | 57 | 2 |
100 | North Texas | 57 | 2 |
101 | UAB | 57 | 2.5 |
102 | Vanderbilt | 57 | 1 |
103 | Army | 56 | 2 |
104 | Old Dominion | 56 | 2 |
105 | San Jose State | 56 | 2 |
106 | Navy | 55 | 2 |
107 | Western Michigan | 55 | 2 |
108 | Ohio | 54.5 | 2 |
109 | Florida Atlantic | 54 | 2 |
110 | Utah State | 54 | 2 |
111 | Central Michigan | 53.5 | 2 |
112 | Hawai’i | 53 | 2 |
113 | Tulsa | 53 | 1 |
114 | Georgia State | 52.5 | 2 |
115 | Southern Mississippi | 52.5 | 2 |
116 | Charlotte | 51 | 1 |
117 | Ball State | 50.5 | 2 |
118 | Nevada | 50.5 | 1.5 |
119 | Middle Tennessee | 50 | 2 |
120 | New Mexico State | 50 | 2.5 |
121 | Connecticut | 49 | 2 |
122 | Sam Houston State | 49 | 2 |
123 | Buffalo | 48.5 | 1 |
124 | Eastern Michigan | 48 | 2 |
125 | Louisiana Tech | 48 | 2 |
126 | Louisiana-Monroe | 47 | 2 |
127 | Massachusetts | 47 | 1 |
128 | New Mexico | 47 | 1 |
129 | Akron | 46 | 1 |
130 | UTEP | 46 | 2 |
131 | Florida International | 45.5 | 1 |
132 | Kent State | 45 | 2 |
133 | Temple | 44 | 2 |
134 | Kennesaw State | 43 | 2 |
Week 0 PR Adjustments:
Up: Georgia Tech +2, Nevada +1.5, New Mexico +2
Down: Florida State -3.5, SMU -3, Hawaii -1.5
Some notes on the biggest movers:
Florida State -3.5: The Seminoles defense played well for the most part, but the rebuilt offense looked all out of sorts. DJ Uiagalelei had negative Air Yards Per Pass at halftime and the running game with two pretty highly-touted players in Lawrance Toafili and Roydell Williams had just 3.2 yards per carry. Toafili had 28 yards on one of his eight carries and four yards combined on the other seven. They should improve as the year goes along, but that was ugly.
SMU -3: I was high on SMU, as my projected win total was a full win higher than the market, so this is a bit of a correction on my end after seeing a game. Preston Stone doesn’t look right in the early going and that is a bad Nevada team that the Mustangs nearly lost to.
New Mexico +2: I just wanted to elaborate on this one since I mentioned above how bad the box score looks. New Mexico’s defense couldn’t get off the field. The Lobos actually had six yards per play despite going 1-of-8 on third down. I was also over a win lower on them in the win total market, so it makes sense to adjust up a bit.
Here are my Week 1 college football betting lines:
(sorted by Rotation Number)
Date | Away Team | Home Team | Line |
8/29 | North Carolina | Minnesota | +2.5 |
Coastal Carolina | Jacksonville State | -3.5 | |
8/30 | Temple | Oklahoma | -42.5 |
TCU | Stanford | +10.5 | |
Western Michigan | Wisconsin | -21 | |
Florida Atlantic | Michigan State | -13.5 | |
8/31 | FIU | Indiana | -21 |
Kent State | Pitt | -22.5 | |
UConn | Maryland | -24 | |
Kennesaw State | UTSA | -26.5 | |
Clemson | Georgia (1 pt HFA – Atlanta) | -14.5 | |
Eastern Michigan | UMass | PK | |
Ohio | Syracuse | -14.5 | |
Georgia State | Georgia Tech | -21.5 | |
Old Dominion | South Carolina | -19.5 | |
James Madison | Charlotte | +12 | |
Penn State | West Virginia | +8.5 | |
Boise State | Georgia Southern | +12 | |
Southern Miss | Kentucky | -26 | |
Akron | Ohio State | -50.5 | |
New Mexico | Arizona | -32 | |
Wyoming | Arizona State | -3 | |
Miami (FL) | Florida | +3 | |
Colorado State | Texas | -35.5 | |
UTEP | Nebraska | -28.5 | |
Miami (OH) | Northwestern | -7 | |
UNLV | Houston | -1.5 | |
North Texas | South Alabama | -3.5 | |
Nevada | Troy | -12 | |
Virginia Tech | Vanderbilt | +17.5 | |
Sam Houston | Rice | -12 | |
UCLA | Hawaii | +16 | |
Western Kentucky | Alabama | -32.5 | |
Fresno State | Michigan | -21.5 | |
Notre Dame | Texas A&M | +1.5 | |
9/1 | LSU | USC (N – Las Vegas) | +7 |
9/2 | Boston College | Florida State | -20 |
Some notes on my biggest line differences:
North Carolina -2.5 (+1.5) at Minnesota: This line is starting to swing in UNC’s direction and they may very well be favored before too long. As I wrote about in our 2024 College Football Betting Guide best bets section, I’m high on the Tar Heels this season and it starts here for me.
Western Michigan +21.5 (+24.5) at Wisconsin: Looks like I’m a tad low on the Badgers to open up the year. This is definitely not me having a desire to back the Broncos, but Wisconsin needs to prove it to me to open up the year. This isn’t a bet, but a game I’ll follow closely on Friday.
James Madison -12 (-6.5) at Charlotte: The biggest overlay of the week for me. I’m not sure JMU will really miss a beat with a new coach and a new roster, as they’ve still got a lot of really good players. Charlotte is a straight fade for me with Biff Poggi. I’m not a believer. Perhaps I’m missing an injury or some suspensions here, but I disagree with this line coming down.
Wyoming +6.5 (+3) at Arizona State: I low-key like the Cowboys this season. I think Jay Sawvel will run this a lot like Craig Bohl did, but maybe with some more offensive creativity. Arizona State didn’t get a lot of physicality in the Pac-12 and won’t see much in the Big 12. I’m not sure they’re ready for it here.
That said, I am a little worried about the weather in the second half for the boys from Laramie. The forecasted high is 105 in Tempe on Saturday. At least it’s a late game.
Northwestern -7 (-3.5) vs. Miami (OH): DraftKings is even below the key number here at 2.5. I know it’s a weird year for Northwestern, but I think David Braun is a damn good coach. That’s what we saw last year and this is still Big Ten vs. MAC.
North Texas +5.5 (+3.5) at South Alabama: I’m not sure I’m completely committed to firing on UNT here, but South Alabama is a team I’m expecting a major step back from and I think the Mean Green could make some strides. I like their head coach Eric Morris and I know they can score. It’s a high total, but the Over intrigues me with Kane Wommack and Corey Batoon gone from the South Alabama sidelines.
Notre Dame -1.5 (+3) at Texas A&M: I think I just have a bad line and a bad power rating on both teams here. I’m going to wait and see, but I think I’m overvaluing ND and undervaluing A&M a little. I may make some sizable adjustments with these two if this game plays out as the market thinks it will with a lot of Texas A&M money.
LSU -7 (-4.5) vs. USC: The standalone Sunday game is a really good one. I’m interested to see how it plays out. This is one where I think I might be high on LSU and low on USC, but we’ll see if USC’s defense is truly improved under D’Anton Lynn. If so, they’ll get an immediate bump if Miller Moss looks any good.
I’ll be posting this weekly Power Ratings update all season long, including my lines on the games. Keep it locked in right here at VSiN and bookmark our weekly College Football Hub to get all of our written content every week during CFB season.