Week 2 College Football
The Week 2 college football power ratings balancing act has begun. One (or two) data point out of 12 or 13 is in the books for nearly everybody, as I’ll make my adjustments to TCU and North Carolina after their standalone Monday night game. You don’t want to overreact to what you just saw, but you also don’t want to under-react either. Trying to maintain your priors and your offseason research can be a real challenge because college football, and football in general, is such a knee-jerk reaction sport because we’re all watching it and all have eyes on as much as we can.
One thing I noticed this past week is that a lot of teams had quarterbacks as their leading rushers. With all of the transfer portal movement, it’s not a big surprise, but we did see some guys that typically aren’t known as big rushers wind up leading their teams. Take Jake Retzlaff at Tulane for instance. He had one big, explosive run and had 113 yards on 10 carries for the Green Wave. Offensive lines are not in sync early in the process and a QB who can move is a huge asset right now.
Anyway, back to the updated power ratings process. As I talked about last week when we had four FBS vs. FBS games to consider and nine FBS teams, box score study and comparing my line to the closing line are my two primary methods for updating my team ratings. I’ve enlisted the help of Game on Paper this season, along with looking through the ESPN box scores, to try and take a deeper, more advanced look at how a game played out. I’m hoping that I can get some more accurate representations of teams as a result.
We’ll see how it works going forward, but for now, I’ve got my new numbers and will be fascinated to see how the market reacts to this week’s set of games, especially for teams that looked great or looked terrible in Week 1.
Week 2 College Football Power Ratings
Rank | Team | PR | HFA |
1 | Ohio State | 90 | 3.5 |
2 | Penn State | 90 | 3.5 |
3 | Georgia | 89.5 | 3 |
4 | Texas | 89 | 3.5 |
5 | LSU | 87.5 | 3.5 |
6 | Oregon | 86 | 3.5 |
7 | Texas A&M | 86 | 2 |
8 | Notre Dame | 85.5 | 3 |
9 | Clemson | 85 | 2.5 |
10 | Alabama | 83.5 | 3.5 |
11 | Michigan | 83 | 3 |
12 | Florida | 82.5 | 2 |
13 | Oklahoma | 82 | 3 |
14 | Tennessee | 81.5 | 3.5 |
15 | Miami (Florida) | 81 | 2 |
16 | Auburn | 80.5 | 2 |
17 | Mississippi | 80.5 | 3 |
18 | South Carolina | 79.5 | 2.5 |
19 | Indiana | 79 | 2.5 |
20 | Louisville | 79 | 3.5 |
21 | Arizona State | 78.5 | 2 |
22 | Utah | 78 | 3 |
23 | USC | 77.5 | 3 |
24 | Iowa State | 77 | 2 |
25 | TCU | 77 | 3 |
26 | Illinois | 76.5 | 2 |
27 | Missouri | 76.5 | 3.5 |
28 | Texas Tech | 76.5 | 3 |
29 | Florida State | 76 | 2 |
30 | Kansas State | 76 | 3.5 |
31 | SMU | 75.5 | 3.5 |
32 | Baylor | 75 | 2 |
33 | Nebraska | 75 | 2 |
34 | Washington | 74.5 | 3.5 |
35 | Iowa | 74 | 3 |
36 | Kansas | 74 | 2.5 |
37 | Georgia Tech | 73.5 | 2 |
38 | Arkansas | 73 | 2 |
39 | BYU | 72 | 2 |
40 | Minnesota | 72 | 2 |
41 | Wisconsin | 72 | 2 |
42 | Vanderbilt | 71.5 | 1.5 |
43 | Virginia Tech | 71.5 | 2 |
44 | Pittsburgh | 69.5 | 2 |
45 | Cincinnati | 69 | 1.5 |
46 | Colorado | 69 | 2 |
47 | Duke | 69 | 3.5 |
48 | Boston College | 68.5 | 2 |
49 | Houston | 68.5 | 2 |
50 | Michigan State | 68 | 2 |
51 | Rutgers | 68 | 2 |
52 | Tulane | 68 | 2.5 |
53 | Boise State | 67.5 | 3.5 |
54 | California | 67 | 2 |
55 | Mississippi State | 67 | 2 |
56 | Navy | 67 | 2 |
57 | North Carolina | 67 | 2 |
58 | North Carolina State | 67 | 2 |
59 | Virginia | 67 | 2 |
60 | Arizona | 66.5 | 2 |
61 | UTSA | 66.5 | 3.5 |
62 | Kentucky | 66 | 2 |
63 | South Florida | 66 | 1.5 |
64 | Syracuse | 66 | 2.5 |
65 | West Virginia | 66 | 2 |
66 | UCLA | 65.5 | 2 |
67 | Maryland | 65 | 2 |
68 | Memphis | 64.5 | 2.5 |
69 | James Madison | 64 | 3 |
70 | UCF | 64 | 2 |
71 | Northwestern | 62.5 | 1.5 |
72 | Oklahoma State | 61.5 | 2 |
73 | Texas State | 60.5 | 2 |
74 | East Carolina | 60 | 2 |
75 | Fresno State | 60 | 2 |
76 | Toledo | 60 | 3 |
77 | Western Kentucky | 60 | 2.5 |
78 | Louisiana-Lafayette | 59.5 | 2 |
79 | North Texas | 59.5 | 2 |
80 | UNLV | 59.5 | 2.5 |
81 | Ohio | 59 | 3.5 |
82 | Old Dominion | 59 | 1.5 |
83 | San Jose State | 59 | 2.5 |
84 | Connecticut | 58.5 | 2.5 |
85 | Liberty | 58.5 | 3 |
86 | Oregon State | 58.5 | 3.5 |
87 | Air Force | 58 | 2 |
88 | Georgia Southern | 58 | 3.5 |
89 | South Alabama | 58 | 2 |
90 | Appalachian State | 57.5 | 2 |
91 | Army | 57 | 2.5 |
92 | Stanford | 57 | 1 |
93 | Wake Forest | 57 | 2 |
94 | Buffalo | 56.5 | 2 |
95 | Colorado State | 56 | 2 |
96 | Purdue | 55.5 | 1 |
97 | Wyoming | 55.5 | 2 |
98 | Arkansas State | 55 | 2 |
99 | Miami (Ohio) | 55 | 2.5 |
100 | Coastal Carolina | 54 | 2 |
101 | Hawai’i | 54 | 2 |
102 | Troy | 54 | 3 |
103 | Louisiana-Monroe | 53.5 | 2 |
104 | Northern Illinois | 53.5 | 1 |
105 | Washington State | 53.5 | 3 |
106 | Rice | 53 | 3 |
107 | Louisiana Tech | 52.5 | 2 |
108 | San Diego State | 52.5 | 2 |
109 | Utah State | 52.5 | 2 |
110 | Bowling Green | 52 | 2 |
111 | Marshall | 52 | 3 |
112 | Central Michigan | 51.5 | 2 |
113 | Jacksonville State | 51 | 3.5 |
114 | Nevada | 51 | 1 |
115 | Southern Mississippi | 51 | 2 |
116 | Temple | 50.5 | 2 |
117 | Georgia State | 50 | 1 |
118 | Florida Atlantic | 49 | 2 |
119 | New Mexico | 49 | 2 |
120 | Western Michigan | 49 | 2 |
121 | Florida International | 48 | 2 |
122 | Charlotte | 47.5 | 1 |
123 | Missouri State | 47.5 | 2 |
124 | Tulsa | 46.5 | 1 |
125 | UAB | 46.5 | 2.5 |
126 | Akron | 46 | 2 |
127 | Eastern Michigan | 46 | 2 |
128 | UTEP | 46 | 2 |
129 | New Mexico State | 45.5 | 2.5 |
130 | Delaware | 45 | 3 |
131 | Sam Houston State | 45 | 0.5 |
132 | Kennesaw State | 44 | 1.5 |
133 | Massachusetts | 42 | 1 |
134 | Middle Tennessee | 41.5 | 2 |
135 | Ball State | 40.5 | 2.5 |
136 | Kent State | 37.5 | 1 |
Here are my Week 2 power ratings adjustments:
Up: South Florida +3, Missouri +1.5, Central Michigan +3, Kennesaw State +2, Auburn +2, Michigan State +2, Kansas +1.5, Purdue +1.5, New Mexico +1, Temple +2, Maryland +1.5, Virginia +2, Utah State +2, Arizona +1.5, Utah +4, Florida State +5, Texas A&M +2.5, Rice +2.5, Cal +3, Iowa State +2, Tulsa +2.5, LSU +2, East Carolina +1, UL Monroe +1.5, Wyoming +1, App State +2, Western Kentucky +2, Texas State +1.5, Miami (FL) +2
Down: Boise State -4.5, UCF -2, Buffalo -2.5, Bowling Green -2, UAB -2, San Jose State -3, Wake Forest -2, Baylor -2, Sam Houston State -3, Western Michigan -3, Army -3, Ball State -3, Michigan -1, Florida Atlantic -2, Coastal Carolina -2, Texas -2, UTEP -2, Hawaii -2.5, UCLA -4, Georgia State -2, Alabama -6, UTSA -1, Louisiana -1.5, Oregon State -2, Northern Illinois -1.5, Kansas State -2.5, Middle Tennessee -5, Washington State -2.5, Clemson -2, Delaware -2, Oklahoma State -1.5, Ohio State -1, Arizona State -1, SMU -1.5, Kentucky -2, Liberty -1.5, Eastern Michigan -1.5, Notre Dame -1
(note, no adjustments made yet for TCU/UNC)
Some notes on the biggest movers:
Florida State +5: Maybe it’s the name change to “Tommy” Castellanos, but what an impressive performance from the Seminoles. And also, what a deplorable performance from Kalen DeBoer’s team. More on that soon.
Utah +4: I knew I was too low on Utah when I saw what my line looked like against UCLA. Then I knew I was too low when they humiliated UCLA in the Rose Bowl.
Cal +3: Life without Fernando Mendoza seemed to go okay for the Golden Bears. I had that line pick ‘em against Oregon State. The line movement to the Cal side was correct and I made adjustments to both teams.
South Florida +3: The talk is going to be more about a no-show from Boise State, but maybe USF is legit in Year 3 for Alex Golesh.
Central Michigan +3: My line was not only too high favoring San Jose State, but Central Michigan won the game outright. Adjustment warranted, adjustment made.
Alabama -6: Hideous. Awful. Terrible. Not even just schematically, but there were some downright poor efforts on that field. I really loved DeBoer at Washington. I do not really love him at Alabama. Shocking, to be honest.
Middle Tennessee -5: I really thought there would be some improvement in Year 2 under Derek Mason, but losing by 20 at home to Austin Peay has me singing a much different tune now.
Boise State -4.5: I mean, we all saw that performance, right?
UCLA -4: A line adjustment, but also, that was an absolute beatdown by the Utes. Nico Iamaleava has a nice bank account, but I’m not sure he’s a nice QB.
Army -3: You cannot open the season by losing to Tarleton. You just can’t. Life without Bryson Daily and Kanye Udoh already seems hard.
Western Michigan -3: You know, I really liked this team coming into the season. They weren’t going to beat Michigan State, but the market was strongly against them and the market was right, as a garbage-time pick six resulted in the Broncos’ only points and, somehow, a cover.
Sam Houston State -3: Back-to-back weeks with a drop. I don’t think Phil Longo succeeds here and that defense is abhorrent.
My Week 2 College Football Lines
(note: games are ordered by rotation number)
Date | Away Team | Home Team | Line |
9/5 | James Madison | Louisville | -18.5 |
Northern Illinois | Maryland | -13.5 | |
9/6 | FIU | Penn State | -45.5 |
Kent State | Texas Tech | -42 | |
Virginia | NC State | -2 | |
San Jose State | Texas | -33.5 | |
Liberty | Jacksonville State | +4 | |
Central Michigan | Pitt | -20 | |
Iowa | Iowa State | -5 | |
UConn | Syracuse | -10 | |
Baylor | SMU | -4 | |
Illinois | Duke | +4 | |
Kennesaw State | Indiana | -37.5 | |
Utah State | Texas A&M | -35.5 | |
Ole Miss | Kentucky | +12.5 | |
Kansas | Missouri | -6 | |
UAB | Navy | -22.5 | |
North Texas | Western Michigan | +8.5 | |
Fresno State | Oregon State | -2 | |
Troy | Clemson | -33.5 | |
Miami (OH) | Rutgers | -15 | |
Bowling Green | Cincinnati | -18.5 | |
Oklahoma State | Oregon | -28 | |
Texas State | UTSA | -9.5 | |
Delaware | Colorado | -26 | |
Middle Tennessee | Wisconsin | -32.5 | |
West Virginia | Ohio | +3.5 | |
South Florida | Florida | -18.5 | |
Arkansas State | Arkansas | -20 | |
Sam Houston State | Hawaii | -11 | |
Missouri State | Marshall | -7.5 | |
North Carolina | Charlotte | +18.5 | |
Army | Kansas State | -22.5 | |
Memphis | Georgia State | +13.5 | |
Tulane | South Alabama | +8 | |
Western Kentucky | Toledo | -3 | |
Houston | Rice | +12.5 | |
Vanderbilt | Virginia Tech | -2 | |
Louisiana Tech | LSU | -38.5 | |
Boston College | Michigan State | -1.5 | |
Ball State | Auburn | -42 | |
Akron | Nebraska | -31 | |
Arizona State | Mississippi State | +9.5 | |
Michigan | Oklahoma | -2 | |
Georgia Southern | USC | -22.5 | |
UL Monroe | Alabama | -33.5 | |
UCLA | UNLV | +3.5 | |
Tulsa | New Mexico State | -1.5 | |
Stanford | BYU | -17 | |
San Diego State | Washington State | -4 |
Some games to consider based on my lines vs. the market:
Louisville -14.5 (-18.5) vs. James Madison: This one is moving towards the Dukes early. I was purposely high on Louisville coming into the season thanks to Miller Moss and this will test that sentiment.
Texas A&M -29.5 (-35.5) vs. Utah State: The Aggies laid the smackdown on UTSA in a game that wasn’t really as close as the final score would suggest. Also, the mobile QB angle here with Marcel Reed.
UTSA -9.5 (-4.5) vs. Texas State: This feels a bit to me like how I had Fresno State this past week against Georgia Southern. Texas A&M is ferocious on defense and Owen McCown really struggled. I think he gets right here. One of my bigger overlays of the week.
Kansas State -22.5 (-15.5) vs. Army: This is a tough one because of how Army can condense games with their long drives. But, honestly, Iowa State and North Dakota are both better than this version of Army.
New Mexico State +3.5 (-1.5) vs. Tulsa: Maybe Tulsa is for real with new head coach Tre Lamb, but this was a team I really didn’t like coming into the season and don’t think they should be laying a road number to most anybody at this stage.
I’ll be posting this weekly Power Ratings update all season long, including my lines on the games. Keep it locked in right here at VSiN and bookmark our weekly College Football Hub to get all of our written content every week during CFB season.