Week 5 College Football
It is wild to think about, but as we head into Week 5 college football, teams that haven’t had a bye week yet have already played a third of their regular seasons. Most teams play 12 games – a handful play 13 – so four games means a pretty big chunk of the season. Given that there is no training camp or really any chance to gel with all the new faces, the early part of the season can be a highly volatile environment.
And, as we all know, we’ve certainly seen that thus far for the non-elite teams. And some of the teams that we thought would be elite, or close to it, are not. Admittedly, when it comes to updating college football power ratings, it does make it a bit difficult to see performances at both ends of the spectrum. The teams in the middle and the teams that are bad, but not terrible, are the most guilty of this thus far. Unfortunately, those are the teams that I try to focus on the most, since the highly-publicized, more scrutinized teams typically don’t yield as much value.
To add another wrinkle, we’re at the point where some teams are changing quarterbacks in hopes of catching a spark. The margin for error is so small these days with the transitional period of getting used to playing with everybody coupled with what’s at stake. It worked for Texas Tech and Colorado, as the Red Raiders made an in-game change and the Buffaloes made a pregame change. It also worked for Army and Air Force, as they lost, but looked much better on offense. Western Michigan also stopped the two-quarterback rotation and upset Toledo.
So, those are things you want to follow as well and just scanning final scores isn’t enough. While it hardly guarantees future success to make a QB change, it does add another element of uncertainty that we have to either grade right away or grade after accumulating another data point or two.
It makes for a busy Sunday morning of recapping the Saturday that was and trying to plan ahead for the next round of games.
Week 5 College Football Power Ratings
Rank | Team | PR | HFA |
1 | Ohio State | 90 | 3.5 |
2 | Penn State | 90 | 3.5 |
3 | Georgia | 89 | 3 |
4 | Oregon | 89 | 3.5 |
5 | Alabama | 87 | 3.5 |
6 | Miami (Florida) | 86.5 | 2 |
7 | LSU | 84.5 | 3.5 |
8 | Texas A&M | 84 | 2 |
9 | Texas | 83.5 | 3.5 |
10 | Missouri | 83 | 3.5 |
11 | USC | 83 | 3 |
12 | Indiana | 82.5 | 2.5 |
13 | Tennessee | 82.5 | 3.5 |
14 | Texas Tech | 82.5 | 3 |
15 | Oklahoma | 82 | 3 |
16 | Notre Dame | 81 | 3 |
17 | Michigan | 80.5 | 3 |
18 | Mississippi | 80.5 | 3 |
19 | Utah | 80.5 | 3 |
20 | Auburn | 79.5 | 2 |
21 | TCU | 79.5 | 3 |
22 | Florida | 79 | 2 |
23 | Florida State | 78.5 | 2 |
24 | Arizona State | 78 | 2 |
25 | Vanderbilt | 78 | 1.5 |
26 | Baylor | 76.5 | 2 |
27 | Iowa | 76.5 | 3 |
28 | Louisville | 76 | 3.5 |
29 | Georgia Tech | 75.5 | 2 |
30 | Kansas | 75.5 | 2.5 |
31 | Nebraska | 75 | 2 |
32 | Illinois | 74.5 | 2 |
33 | Washington | 74.5 | 3.5 |
34 | Arkansas | 74 | 2 |
35 | BYU | 74 | 2 |
36 | Clemson | 74 | 2.5 |
37 | Iowa State | 74 | 2 |
38 | SMU | 74 | 3.5 |
39 | South Carolina | 74 | 2.5 |
40 | Minnesota | 73 | 2 |
41 | Mississippi State | 73 | 2 |
42 | Houston | 70.5 | 2 |
43 | South Florida | 70 | 1.5 |
44 | Boise State | 69 | 3.5 |
45 | Cincinnati | 69 | 1.5 |
46 | Duke | 69 | 3.5 |
47 | Kentucky | 69 | 2 |
48 | Virginia | 69 | 2 |
49 | Rutgers | 68.5 | 2 |
50 | Wisconsin | 68.5 | 2 |
51 | Michigan State | 68 | 2 |
52 | North Carolina State | 68 | 2 |
53 | Tulane | 68 | 2.5 |
54 | Colorado | 67.5 | 2 |
55 | Navy | 67 | 2 |
56 | Pittsburgh | 67 | 2 |
57 | Arizona | 66.5 | 2 |
58 | California | 66.5 | 2 |
59 | UCF | 66.5 | 2 |
60 | Memphis | 65.5 | 2.5 |
61 | Boston College | 65 | 2 |
62 | James Madison | 65 | 3 |
63 | Kansas State | 65 | 3.5 |
64 | Ohio | 64.5 | 3.5 |
65 | Texas State | 64.5 | 2 |
66 | Maryland | 64 | 2 |
67 | Virginia Tech | 64 | 2 |
68 | West Virginia | 63.5 | 2 |
69 | East Carolina | 63 | 2 |
70 | North Texas | 63 | 2 |
71 | Fresno State | 62 | 2 |
72 | Old Dominion | 61.5 | 1.5 |
73 | Northwestern | 61 | 1.5 |
74 | UNLV | 61 | 2.5 |
75 | Toledo | 60.5 | 3 |
76 | Army | 60 | 2.5 |
77 | Syracuse | 60 | 2.5 |
78 | North Carolina | 59 | 2 |
79 | Utah State | 59 | 2 |
80 | UTSA | 58.5 | 3.5 |
81 | Air Force | 58 | 2 |
82 | Purdue | 58 | 1 |
83 | Oregon State | 57 | 3.5 |
84 | Wake Forest | 57 | 2 |
85 | Hawai’i | 56.5 | 2 |
86 | Louisiana Tech | 56.5 | 2 |
87 | Rice | 56.5 | 3 |
88 | San Jose State | 56.5 | 2.5 |
89 | South Alabama | 56.5 | 2 |
90 | Miami (Ohio) | 56 | 2.5 |
91 | Oklahoma State | 56 | 2 |
92 | UCLA | 56 | 2 |
93 | Connecticut | 55.5 | 2.5 |
94 | Georgia Southern | 55.5 | 3.5 |
95 | Western Kentucky | 55.5 | 2.5 |
96 | Jacksonville State | 54.5 | 3.5 |
97 | Bowling Green | 54 | 2 |
98 | Southern Mississippi | 54 | 2 |
99 | Appalachian State | 53.5 | 2 |
100 | Colorado State | 53.5 | 2 |
101 | San Diego State | 53.5 | 2 |
102 | Stanford | 53 | 1 |
103 | Temple | 52.5 | 2 |
104 | Tulsa | 52.5 | 1 |
105 | Wyoming | 52.5 | 2 |
106 | Arkansas State | 52 | 2 |
107 | Northern Illinois | 52 | 1 |
108 | Buffalo | 51.5 | 2 |
109 | Central Michigan | 51.5 | 2 |
110 | New Mexico | 51.5 | 2 |
111 | Troy | 51.5 | 3 |
112 | Florida International | 51 | 2 |
113 | Delaware | 50.5 | 3 |
114 | Liberty | 50 | 3 |
115 | UTEP | 50 | 2 |
116 | Washington State | 50 | 3 |
117 | Louisiana-Lafayette | 49.5 | 2 |
118 | Louisiana-Monroe | 49.5 | 2 |
119 | Florida Atlantic | 49 | 2 |
120 | Western Michigan | 49 | 2 |
121 | Missouri State | 48.5 | 2 |
122 | Georgia State | 48 | 1 |
123 | Marshall | 48 | 3 |
124 | Coastal Carolina | 47.5 | 2 |
125 | UAB | 47.5 | 2.5 |
126 | Kennesaw State | 47 | 1.5 |
127 | Nevada | 47 | 1 |
128 | Eastern Michigan | 46.5 | 2 |
129 | New Mexico State | 45.5 | 2.5 |
130 | Charlotte | 45 | 1 |
131 | Sam Houston State | 43 | 0.5 |
132 | Middle Tennessee | 41.5 | 2 |
133 | Akron | 41 | 2 |
134 | Massachusetts | 39.5 | 1 |
135 | Kent State | 39 | 1 |
136 | Ball State | 38 | 2.5 |
Here are my Week 5 power ratings adjustments:
Up: Rice +3.5, Tulsa +3.5, Iowa +1.5, North Texas +2, TCU +2.5, Eastern Michigan +2, UCF +2.5, Miami (OH) +1, BYU +2, Indiana +2.5, Florida State +1, Texas Tech +3.5, Kansas +1.5, Baylor +1.5, USC +2, Memphis +1, Purdue +1, Mississippi State +2.5, Hawaii +2.5, Kennesaw State +3, Delaware +3.5, Boise State +1.5, Sam Houston +1, UTEP +2.5, San Diego State +3.5, Kent State +1.5, Vanderbilt +1.5, James Madison +1, Virginia +2, Utah State +1.5, Colorado +1.5, Army +2, Bowling Green +2, Alabama +2
Down: Charlotte -2.5, Oklahoma State -3.5, Rutgers -1.5, SMU -1.5, Louisiana -4.5, North Carolina -3.5, Clemson -3.5, Illinois -3.5, Toledo -2.5, UTSA -4, Wyoming -2.5, Utah -1.5, Arkansas -3, Notre Dame -1, Liberty -2.5, Western Kentucky -2, Washington State -2, Texas -1, UL Monroe -1.5, Cal -3.5, Oklahoma -2, Tulane -1.5, Temple -1.5, Syracuse -3 (Angeli), UConn -2, Buffalo -2, Arizona State -1.5
Some notes on the biggest movers:
Texas Tech +3.5: Statement performance from the Red Raiders in SLC, but also, is Will Hammond better than Behren Morton? Joey Mcguire may have a QB controversy on his hands now.
San Diego State +3.5: I wound up getting too low on the Aztecs. My biggest overlay last week was Cal vs. San Diego State and the Aztecs rolled in a shutout win.
Rice +3.5: Scott Abell’s offense has taken hold quickly. A really good, very impressive win over Charlotte.
Delaware +3.5: The Blue Hens have been very impressive to this point. They’re far better offensively than I expected and had a strong defensive effort against FIU.
Tulsa +3.5: The Friday night game was probably more of an indictment on Oklahoma State and Mike Gundy’s extremely hot seat, but still. That’s an enormous win for a Tulsa program that won three games last season. Tre Lamb has really injected a lot of positivity into that program.
Kennesaw State +3: I really expected the Owls to be quite poor this season after everything that happened last year with Brian Bohanon’s dismissal and the portal exodus. But, the close loss at Wake Forest and what was a more convincing win than the 28-21 score would suggest over Arkansas State have been impressive.
Louisiana -4.5: The Ragin’ Cajuns have almost always found good QB play, but they don’t have it this season and it’s going to be a very long year for Michael Desormeaux.
UTSA -4: Well, I gave up. UTSA probably deserved the cover, as they gave up what could’ve been a game-tying TD with under 30 seconds left if Colorado State had kicked the PAT. They went for 2 and lost the game. But, I’ve given up on the Roadrunners now.
North Carolina -3.5: Had a few good calls, had a few bad calls last week. UNC and UCF was absolutely not a good call. The Tar Heels look terrible. The Bill Belichick experiment is not working.
Clemson -3.5: Pretty self-explanatory here.
Illinois -3.5: This is your annual cautionary tale to not overreact to “returning production”. A lot of people were guilty of it and I, too, had Illinois ranked too high, even if just to keep up with everybody else. But, this was not a top-10-caliber team. And Indiana, with virtually no returning production on offense, completely pummeled the Illini.
Oklahoma State -3.5: Pretty self-explanatory here.
Cal -3.5: Market correction. I got too excited about Cal’s early-season accomplishments and, as mentioned above, had that huge (incorrect) overlay against SDSU.
Syracuse -3: Made a three-point adjustment for the Steve Angeli injury. Might be enough. Might not be enough. A brutal end to a good day for the Syracuse program.
My Week 5 College Football Lines
(note: games are ordered by rotation number)
Date | Away Team | Home Team | Line |
9/25 | Army | East Carolina | -5 |
9/26 | Florida State | Virginia | +7.5 |
TCU | Arizona State | -0.5 | |
Houston | Oregon State | +10 | |
9/27 | Bowling Green | Ohio | -14 |
Georgia Southern | James Madison | -12.5 | |
Akron | Toledo | -22.5 | |
Utah | West Virginia | +15 | |
Liberty | Old Dominion | -13 | |
Memphis | FAU | +14.5 | |
San Diego State | Northern Illinois | +0.5 | |
Notre Dame | Arkansas | +5 | |
Cal | Boston College | -0.5 | |
UConn | Buffalo | +2 | |
Virginia Tech | NC State | -6 | |
Indiana | Iowa | +3 | |
Louisville | Pitt | +7 | |
Duke | Syracuse | +6.5 | |
Georgia Tech | Wake Forest | +16.5 | |
Eastern Michigan | Central Michigan | -7 | |
UCLA | Northwestern | -6.5 | |
Rutgers | Minnesota | -6.5 | |
Utah State | Vanderbilt | -20.5 | |
Hawaii | Air Force | -3.5 | |
App State | Boise State | -13 | |
New Mexico State | New Mexico | -8 | |
San Jose State | Stanford | +2.5 | |
Jacksonville State | Southern Miss | -1.5 | |
Cincinnati | Kansas | -9 | |
Arizona | Iowa State | -9.5 | |
Rice | Navy | -12.5 | |
Tennessee | Mississippi State | +7.5 | |
Baylor | Oklahoma State | +18.5 | |
Kentucky | South Carolina | -7.5 | |
South Alabama | North Texas | -8.5 | |
UCF | Kansas State | -2 | |
LSU | Mississippi | +1 | |
Tulane | Tulsa | +14.5 | |
Marshall | Louisiana | -3.5 | |
USC | Illinois | +6.5 | |
Arkansas State | UL Monroe | +0.5 | |
UMass | Missouri | -47 | |
Auburn | Texas A&M | -6.5 | |
MTSU | Kennesaw State | -7 | |
Western Kentucky | Missouri State | +5 | |
Washington State | Colorado State | -5.5 | |
Oregon | Penn State | -4.5 | |
Alabama | Georgia | -5 | |
Louisiana Tech | UTEP | +4.5 | |
Ohio State | Washington | +12 | |
BYU | Colorado | +4.5 |
Some games to consider based on my lines vs. the market:
Utah -10.5 (-15) at West Virginia: Weird trip, mid-afternoon kick in Morgantown, but I think Texas Tech might just be extremely good. This is a West Virginia team that lost at Ohio, got destroyed by Kansas, and beat a Pitt team in between that might not be very good. Maybe Utah lays one on ‘em here.
Northern Illinois +3 (+0.5) vs. San Diego State: Very, very weird trip for San Diego State to head to DeKalb here. NIU’s defense is legitimately good. The offense, well, not so much.
Cal +6.5 (+0.5) at Boston College: I have heavily downgraded Boston College this season, due in large part to the fact that Tommy Castellanos looks like a completely different player with Florida State and I think Bill O’Brien might be a very bad coach. Long trip for Cal, but at least they haven’t had bad travel to this point. Also, that 34-0 loss to SDSU was a little misleading.
Cal was essentially -5 in turnovers (3 TO, 2 TOD), gave up two defensive TDs, and had two red zone turnovers, including a 97-yard pick six.
Iowa +7 (+3) vs. Indiana: Yeah, Indiana looks great so far, but Iowa still has a strong defense. I think this is a big measuring stick game for the Hoosiers.
New Mexico State +14 (+8) vs. New Mexico: I think New Mexico is inflated from the UCLA win. I guess the last data point for the Aggies was brutal, but they did beat a Tulsa team that just beat Oklahoma State.
UCF +6 (+2.5) at Kansas State: Kansas State was a big adjustment down for me last week. Let’s see if I was right. Also, by bumping UCF 2.5 points this week, I went from +5 to +2.5, so I was much closer to market prior to that.
I’ll be posting this weekly Power Ratings update all season long, including my lines on the games. Keep it locked in right here at VSiN and bookmark our weekly College Football Hub to get all of our written content every week during CFB season.