After a second round that produced two blowouts and two competitive series, we have reached the Conference Finals portion of the NBA playoff schedule, so does my coverage of the top betting trends and systems for the round, looking at both series and game-by-game wagering options. This is part three of a four-part series, with just the NBA Finals segment to go. Unfortunately, what we’ve seen so far has been very few competitive games, as only six of the playoffs’ first 74 games have been decided by 3 points or fewer. We already know that the NBA Finals are scheduled to tip off on Wednesday, June 3rd, so you will see that last piece in about two weeks. Who will reach the title series? Cleveland or New York? San Antonio or OKC? Do the rest and fewer playoff games played so far benefit New York or OKC? You will find one particular trend on that which has been an incredible performer for bettors, and I’ve highlighted it in gray below.

As I reasoned in the first two articles of this package, being able to predict an upset in a series will give you a leg up on a game-by-game wagering basis. Accurately projecting which underdogs will push a series deep, or alternatively, which favorites will end a series quickly, can really boost your wagering profit in this round and all others. Take a look at some of these series trends based upon won-lost records at various time lengths of the regular season and in the playoffs to date. The first thing to consider is that the chances of seed upsets in the conference finals are quite high, even more so than in the second round.

There have been 20 conference finals series over the last 10 playoff seasons, and the better seeds own just an 11-9 edge in series wins and a 64-48 game wins edge during that span. There have been four sweeps, all by the better seed. The two series’ last year went five and six games, so both were, in essence, “short.”

There have been 16 conference finals series over the last 10 playoff seasons that involved teams squaring off whose regular season win totals were within seven of one another. Those series have been upset-laden, with worse seeds going 9-7 in series but 44-48 in individual games. Both 2026 series are of this type.

The last four times that there have been differences of double-digit margins between teams’ regular season wins, the better seed won all three series and was 16-4 in individual games. This was the case for the Oklahoma City-Minnesota series last year, which went five games

Winning 70%+ of regular season games is a key benchmark of conference championship series success for better seeds. Those that did and weren’t facing a 70%+ win teams are 8-1 in series and 32-14 in individual games. Those that won fewer than 70% if their regular season games are just 3-7 in their last seven conference finals series (27-31 in games).

There has been a massive advantage of late in analyzing the earlier playoff round performances of the teams in a conference finals series. Teams that played fewer games in the first two rounds, or essentially lost fewer games in those series, are on a 20-2 conference finals series run! Four of the last 26 series matched teams that played equal games. The only teams to lose after playing fewer games were Milwaukee in 2019 and Minnesota last year. Considering this information for 2026, both New York and Oklahoma City will be owning edges.

Teams that faced a Game Seven matchup in either of their first two rounds series have won just three of their last 16 conference finals series when not matched up against an opponent that faced a Game Seven itself. Most recently, however, OKC did beat Minnesota in ’25 after playing a 7-game second round series. For 2026, Cleveland has played in two Game Sevens already.

94 points is a low benchmark for conference finals success – Teams that score 94 points or less in a conference finals playoff game have struggled badly, going just 10-54 SU and 11-53 ATS (17.2%) since 2013.

Success accompanies reaching the 116-point mark – Conference finals playoff teams scoring 116 points or more boast a record of 59-8 SU and 58-7-2 ATS (89.2%) over the last 13 seasons. Six of those ATS losses came in the last three years, however.

Big favorites are slowing – From 2013-2108 in the NBA playoffs, conference finals favorites of 5-points or more were 35-6 SU and 28-13 ATS. Since then, they are just 22-14 SU and 14-21-1 ATS (40%).

Most road favorites have been very vulnerable – Road favorites of 7.5-points or fewer are just 14-13 SU and 9-17-1 ATS (35.3%) in their last 27 tries in the Conference Finals, including six straight ATS losses.

High totals have meant Unders – Of the 28 games in the last 10 conference finals seasons with totals of 221 or higher, 19 of them have gone Under the total (67.8%). There is a decent chance that the West Finals could get up into this range at some point.

Totals in the 209-216 range have been most apt to see Over results – There have been 33 games in the last 11 conference finals series that have seen totals in this range, and 24 of them have gone Over (72.7%). Game 1 of the East Finals is showing a total of 216.5 at present.

Zig-zag theory is alive and well in conference finals – Over the last five conference finals seasons, teams coming off outright losses in conference finals games are 30-24 SU and 34-19-1 ATS (64.2%) in their 54 follow-up games. Those that lost by single digits are 24-13 Under (64.9%) the total in their next game.

Close losses and playing on the road have been a bad scenario – While the zig-zag theory is still going strong, one particular line and loss spot isn’t. Teams coming off losses of 10-points or less and playing on the road are just 6-16 SU and 9-13 ATS (40.9%) in conference finals games dating back to 2014.

Conference finals series’ opening games have been tough on home teams of late – Home teams hold a 12-8 SU edge, but they are 8-12 ATS (40%) in conference finals Game Ones since 2015.

The last 10 conference finals Game Ones have been offensive explosions – Ten of the last 12 conference finals Game Ones have gone Over the total (83.3%), producing 233.7 PPG, surpassing posted totals by almost 18 PPG!

Home teams that won the opening game usually win Game Twos as well – The last 13 conference finals Game Two home teams that won Game Two are 12-1 SU and 8-5 ATS (61.5%) in the follow-up contest.

2-0 leads are motivating in a conference finals series – Game Three conference finals teams that are up 2-0 in the series are 5-2 SU and 4-3 ATS (57.1%) in their last seven tries. However, these teams are on three-game losing streaks going into 2026.

Teams that lost big in Game Two bounce back well in Game Three – An interesting trend that has developed over the last 11 playoff seasons finds that conference finals Game Three teams that lost Game Two by double-digits are on a surge of 8-3 SU and 9-2 ATS (81.8%).

Home team Game Fours NOT down 0-3 are strong plays – Home teams not facing elimination in Game Four have fared very well of late, going 12-5 SU and ATS (70.6%) in their last 17, including 2-0 ATS last year.

Teams facing elimination already in Game Four have generally laid down – Conference finals Game Four teams that are facing elimination have gone just 3-6 SU and 4-4-1 ATS (50%) in their last nine tries.

Home teams that won Game Three are also good Game Four bets – conference finals hosts that won Game Three are also on a 7-4 SU and 8-3 ATS (72.7%) run in Game Four.

Simply put, the better seeds win Game Fives– The better-seeded teams have dominated the Game Five action in conference finals series of late, going 15-5 SU and ATS (75%) since 2013. In all 20 of those games, the outright winner covered the point spread as well.

Favorites are on a huge Game Five run – Teams laying the points have gone 16-4 SU and ATS (80%) in conference finals Game Fives.

The team that lost Game Four is a solid Game Five play – teams that lost Game Four are on a 13-7 SU and ATS (65%) run in Game Five of the conference finals.

Game Fives with closeout implications have been high scoring – Since 2016, conference finals Game Fives have gone 7-3 Over (70%) when one of the teams is attempting to close out the series, with games producing 222.6 PPG.

Game Sixes have trended Over the total – Nine of the last 14 conference finals’ Game Sixes have gone Over the total (64.3%).

Teams have capitalized on Game Six closeout opportunities – Five of the last seven conference finals teams attempting to close out a series have won SU while going 6-1 ATS (85.7%). Two of the wins were outright upsets.

Game Sevens have trended Under – All six Game Sevens over the L12 seasons have gone Under the total, by a margin of 17.6 PPG!

Game Six wins haven’t provided momentum for Game Seven – Teams that won Game Six to force a Game Seven have gone only 3-3 SU and ATS (50%) in the last six series deciding contests.

#1 seeds struggle as small favorites and/or underdogs – In their last 41 conference finals games when playing as underdogs or favorites of 4.5-points or less, #1 seeds are just 17-28 SU and 17-27-1 ATS (38.6%).

Lay the wood with #1 seeds – Top-seeded teams have been stellar at covering big point spreads, going 31-3 SU and 21-13 ATS (61.8%) in the conference finals when favored by 6.5-points or more.

#1 seeds thrive after close wins – Top-seeded teams are on a 13-5 SU & 12-6 ATS (66.7%) conference finals run when coming off a same series single-digit win.

#1 seeds are solid bets late in a series – In their last 21 Games 5-7, #1 seeds are 15-9 SU and ATS (62.5%), with outright winners going a perfect 24-0 ATS in those games.

#2 seeds are solid chalk wagers – Conference finals #2 seeds are on a 31-15 SU and 26-20 ATS (56.5%) run as favorites.

#2 seeds are tempting as large dogs, but they have struggled – #2 seeded teams are on a slide of 3-19 SU and 6-16 ATS as underdogs of 5-points or more in the conference finals series over the last 11 years.

#3/4 seeds are solid in the big favorite role – Conference finals #3 and #4 seeds are on a 13-9 SU and ATS (59.1%) run as favorites of 3.5-points or more.

#3/4 seeds in any other line scenario have floundered of late – Conference finals #3 & #4 seeds when not favored by 3.5 points or more have struggled terribly of late, going 11-29 SU and 14-24-2 ATS (36.8%) since 2016. Similarly, they are just 12-19 ATS (38.7%) in their last 31 road conference finals games.

#3/4 seeds have bounced back well from losses – Conference finals #3 & #4 seeds have responded well after losing a same series game, going 20-15 SU & 23-11-1 ATS (67.6%) in their last 35 tries.

Teams seeded #5 or worse have only won a single CF game when favored since prior to 2013 – Teams seeded #5 or lower have gone 1-7 SU & ATS (12.5%) in their last eight games of the conference finals when favored.

Teams seeded #5 or worse have been phenomenal underdogs in the conference finals – Teams seeded #5 or lower have gone 15-17 SU and 22-10 ATS (68.8%) in their last 32 tries in the underdog role.

#3 and lower seeded teams struggle to put back-to-back wins together – Teams seeded #3 or worse and coming off a win in a conference finals series game are just 10-24 SU and 11-22-1 ATS (33.3%) in the follow-up contest.

Road teams looking to close out series have fared well – Nine of the last 12 teams looking to close out a conference finals series on the road have done so, going 9-4 SU & 8-4-1 ATS (66.7%).

Lay the points in closeout games – Conference finals teams looking to close out a series have gone 13-4 SU and 12-5 ATS (70.6%) when favored by 4.5 points or more since 2013, outscoring opponents by 11 PPG.

Closeout games have been definitive – There have been 42 different potential series closeout games in the conference finals in the last 13 seasons and outright winners are 39-2-1 ATS (95.1%).

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR