The following NBA betting trends are a collection of analytical data, betting systems and strength ratings featured on VSiN and qualified for the NBA games on 4/30 and 5/1. This report is meant to emulate the process that Steve Makinen and other members of the VSiN Analytics team undergo when handicapping each day’s NBA board.

AJ’s Angles

These are the top NBA betting trends and systems for today’s games, handpicked by VSiN Analyst AJ Makinen.

* Road teams looking to close out a series in game 6 of the first round are 20-9 SU and 21-8 ATS (72.4%) in their last 29 tries. Outright winners are 28-1 ATS in those games as well.
Trend Matches (PLAY ALL): NEW YORK (-2.5 at ATL), BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI), CLEVELAND (-4.5 at TOR), LA LAKERS (+3.5 at HOU)

* NBA teams playing at home in One Day Rest scenario are 102-53 Under the total vs. teams in 4th in 10+ Days games over the last 2+ Seasons
System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): NYK-ATL (o/u at 213.5), CLE-TOR (o/u at 220.5), LAL-HOU (o/u at 206.5)

* In WC Northwest divisional games, home underdogs are on a 19-24 SU but 31-12 ATS (72.1%) run since early-November 2024.
System Match (PLAY): MINNESOTA (+6.5 vs DEN)

First Round Game Trends by Line/Total Range

Bigger road favorites are also a solid bet – Only 14 of the last 69 road favorites of 4.5 points or more have lost outright, going 55-14 SU and 43-25-1 ATS (63.2%).
Trend Matches (PLAY ALL): BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI), DENVER (-6.5 at MIN), CLEVELAND (-4.5 at TOR)

First round home favorites of 4 points or less have proven to be a bad investment lately, as since 2014, they are just 52-42 SU but 40-53-1 ATS (43%).
Trend Match (FADE): HOUSTON (-3.5 vs LAL)

With the meteoric rise in scoring over the last few years in the NBA, it is interesting to note that in the lowest totaled first round playoff games over the last six postseasons, 218 or less, Under the total is 97-75-5 (56.4%).
Trend Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): NYK-ATL (o/u at 213.5), BOS-PHI (o/u at 212.5), DET-ORL (o/u at 211.5), LAL-HOU (o/u at 206.5)

Last Game Trends

A long-standing trend of home teams being better wager when coming off a win in a series has turned the last three playoff years. In fact, home teams coming off a win in the prior game of a series are 40-31 SU but 31-40 ATS (43.7%). Those coming off a loss are 38-27 SU and 36-29 ATS (55.4%) in that same span. There is seemingly a huge reliance on the court edge. This 11.7% ATS swing is a good indication of how home court advantage can swing momentum in a series.
Trend Matches: PLAY – ATLANTA (+2.5 vs NYK), MINNESOTA (+6.5 vs DEN), ORLANDO (+3.5 vs DET), TORONTO (+4.5 vs CLE)
FADE – PHILADELPHIA (+6.5 vs BOS), HOUSTON (-3.5 vs LAL)

Blowout losses carry over – There is a bit of a misconception when it comes to teams “bouncing back” from rough first round losses. In fact, teams that lost their previous game by 12 points or more are just 74-137 SU and 88-121-2 ATS (42.1%) in the next contest since 2013.
Trend Matches (FADE ALL): ATLANTA (+2.5 vs NYK), BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI), MINNESOTA (+6.5 vs DEN)

Beware of teams that shoot the 3pt shot well in one game but still lose. Those that shot 40.0% or better on 3-point shots but still lost have gone just 25-47-1 ATS (34.7%) in the next contest since 2016 in the first round.
Trend Matches (FADE ALL): MINNESOTA (+6.5 vs DEN), ORLANDO (+3.5 vs DET)

First Round Trends by Game Number

Outright winners have been incredibly proficient against the point spread in game 6s, going 32-3 ATS (91.4%) since 2015.

Game 6s have usually been road domination – Road teams in NBA first round game 6s are 29-17 SU and 33-13 ATS (71.7%) in the last 13 seasons, including 2-1 SU and 3-0 ATS last year.
Trend Matches: PLAY ALL SIX ROAD TEAMS

Road teams looking to close out a series in game 6 of the first round are 20-9 SU and 21-8 ATS (72.4%) in their last 29 tries. Outright winners are 28-1 ATS in those games, but the lone ATS loser in that span came a year ago when Denver failed to win but did cover at the LA Clippers.
Trend Matches (PLAY ALL): NEW YORK (-2.5 at ATL), BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI), CLEVELAND (-4.5 at TOR), LA LAKERS (+3.5 at HOU)

Trends by Seed Number

#1 seeds are 12-4 SU and 10-6 ATS (62.5%) in their last 16 first round games when trailing in a series.
Trend Match (PLAY): DETROIT (-3.5 at ORL)

#2 seeds have been crazy good as bigger chalk – #2 seeded teams are on a strong run of 79-20 SU and 61-38 ATS (61.6%) when favored by 4.5-points or more.
Trend Match (PLAY): BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI)

#2 seeds have also bounced back quickly from losses, 26-4 SU and 23-7 ATS (76.7%) in their last 30.
Trend Match (PLAY): BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI)

 #4 seeds have tended to stack losses, as they are just 32-37 SU and 25-44 ATS (36.2%) since 2013 in same series games following a loss.
Trend Match (FADE): LA LAKERS (+3.5 at HOU)

Trends by teams closing out series or facing elimination

Big road favorites of 5 points or more looking to close out series are money, showing a record of 17-3 SU and 14-6 ATS (70%) since the start of the 2013 postseason.
Trend Match (PLAY): BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI)

Small favorites/underdogs closing out series have also been solid of late – teams attempting to close out a series in a non-game 7 scenario and playing as underdogs or favorites of 2 points or less are on a 15-10 SU and 17-8 ATS (68%) run in their last 25 tries.
Trend Matches (PLAY ALL): MINNESOTA (+6.5 vs DEN), ORLANDO (+3.5 vs DET), LA LAKERS (+3.5 at HOU)

Teams getting a second (or third) closeout opportunity after losing the prior chance are 29-12 SU but 17-22-2 ATS (43.6%) in their last 41 tries.
Trend Matches (FADE ALL ATS): BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI), MINNESOTA (+6.5 vs DEN), ORLANDO (+3.5 vs DET), LA LAKERS (+3.5 at HOU)

Schedule Situations Crucial for NBA Handicapping

The following is an expanded version of the article published in this year’s VSiN NBA Betting Guide, detailing scheduling situations in which teams have shown definitive patterns over the last few seasons. Typically, there are reasons that teams perform at varying levels based on their schedules, whether that be from the amount of rest they’ve gotten before a game, how fatigued they are from a string of games, or how they deal with injuries/workloads based on the schedule pressures.

* NBA teams playing at home in One Day Rest scenario are 66-24 Under the total vs. teams in 3rd in 8+ Days games over the last three seasons
System Match (PLAY UNDER): CLE-TOR (o/u at 220.5)

* NBA teams playing at home in One Day Rest scenario are 102-53 Under the total vs. teams in 4th in 10+ Days games over the last two seasons
System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): NYK-ATL (o/u at 213.5), CLE-TOR (o/u at 220.5), LAL-HOU (o/u at 206.5)

* ATLANTA is 143-114 Over the total playing in the One Day Rest scenario since November 2021
Trend Match (PLAY OVER): NYK-ATL (o/u at 213.5)

* CLEVELAND is just 22-24 SU and 14-32 ATS (30.4%) vs. teams that have winning records right now this season
Trend Match (FADE): CLEVELAND (-4.5 at TOR)

* DETROIT is 18-10 Under the total (64.3%) as a favorite of -1.5 to -5 points this season
* ORLANDO is 128-101 Under the total playing in all One Day Rest games since March 2022
Trends Match (PLAY UNDER): DET-ORL (o/u at 211.5)

Here are the top head-to-head series NBA betting trends in play for the games:

Thursday, April 30, 2026

(509) BOSTON at (510) PHILADELPHIA
* Home teams are on a 7-3 ATS surge in the last 10 of the PHI-BOS divisional rivalry
Trend Match (PLAY): PHILADELPHIA (+6.5 vs BOS)

(513) DENVER at (514) MINNESOTA
* Under the total has converted in the last three meetings between Denver and Minnesota at the Target Center
Trend Match (PLAY UNDER): DEN-MIN (o/u at 225.5)

Friday, May 1, 2026

(521) CLEVELAND at (522) TORONTO
* Home teams are 6-0 SU and 5-1 ATS in last six of the CLE-TOR series
Trend Match (PLAY): TORONTO (+4.5 vs CLE)

(523) LA LAKERS at (524) HOUSTON
* LA LAKERS are 7-4 SU and 8-3 ATS in the last 11 matchups with Houston
Trend Match (PLAY): LA LAKERS (+3.5 at HOU)

(525) DETROIT at (526) ORLANDO
* ORLANDO is 8-1 SU and ATS in the last nine games hosting Detroit
Trend Match (PLAY): ORLANDO (+3.5 vs DET)

NBA Team Strength Systems

The following handicapping information details betting systems for teams based on various team strength indicators or line scenarios. Unless noted, these are from the last five NBA seasons.

NBA Team Strength Betting System #1:
In games between two teams with 60%+ winning percentages, home teams favored in the -4.5 to -9.5 range are on a 192-70 SU and 152-109-1 ATS (58.2%) run.
System Match (PLAY): NONE YET BUT WATCH FOR HOUSTON vs LAL (-3.5 CURRENTLY)

The following handicapping information details betting systems for divisional games.

Eastern Atlantic Division Betting System #1:
In Eastern Atlantic divisional games, single-digit favorites have gone 104-41 SU and 86-66-3 ATS (56.6%) since the start of the 2022-23 season.
System Match (PLAY): BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI)

Western Northwest Division Betting System #1:
In Western Northwest divisional games, home underdogs are on a 19-24 SU and 31-12 ATS (72.1%) run since early-November 2024.
System Match (PLAY): MINNESOTA (+6.5 vs DEN)

Western Northwest Division Betting System #3:
In Western Northwest divisional games, favorites on two days rest or more are 15-9 SU but 8-16 ATS (33.3%) since the start of the 2024 playoffs.
System Match (FADE): DENVER (-6.5 at MIN)

NBA Extreme Stats Next Game Systems

These systems search for extreme statistical performances in NBA games and detail the results of the follow-up game for the teams. These systems are from the last five seasons unless noted.

Road favorites bounce back after losing as home favorite
NBA teams that come off a game in which they lost as home favorites flush that result quickly when next a road favorite, going 187-87 SU and 151-119-4 ATS (56%) (sub-system: 91-31 SU and 70-48-4 ATS (59.3%) when favored by 4 points or more versus intraconference foes) since the start of the 2020-21 season.
System Match (PLAY): BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI)

Rout wins are a warning sign for the next contest for hosts
NBA home teams coming off any game in which they beat the point spread by 20 points or more are 354-269 SU but 290-318-15 ATS (47.8%) over the last seven seasons.  The worst situation for these teams comes against divisional rivals, 51-78-1 ATS (39.5%).
System Match (FADE ATS): PHILADELPHIA (+6.5 vs BOS)

Divisional upsets can create urgency
NBA teams that lose as favorites to divisional opponents have bounced back well when facing another divisional foe, going 115-74 SU and 107-79-3 ATS (57.5%) in that follow-up try over the last five seasons.
System Match (PLAY): BOSTON (-6.5 at PHI)

Teams that win outright versus divisional rivals as double-digit underdogs have trended sharply Under the total in the next contest, going 66-40-1 (62.3%) in their last 107 tries.
System Match (PLAY UNDER): BOS-PHI (o/u at 212.5)

Unusual shooting performance systems
NBA teams off a game in which they were granted 35 or more free throw attempts trended Under the total the next game, 414-359 (53.6%) since 2021.
System Match (PLAY UNDER): DET-ORL (o/u at 211.5)

NBA teams that have made 50% or more of their 3PT field goal attempts in a contest have responded the next time out by going just 363-367 SU and 333-389-8 ATS (46.1%) in the next game over the last five seasons.
System Match (FADE): CLEVELAND (-4.5 at TOR)

NBA Streak Systems

The following handicapping information details betting systems for teams on winning or losing streaks of at least four games in the NBA.

NO QUALIFYING STREAK PLAYS FOR GAME 6

Strategies Using NBA DraftKings Betting Splits Data

One of the most touted features on the VSiN.com website, and a feature that we believe to be a fantastic resource for bettors, is the betting splits pages. These are the pages that we have built utilizing the data that DraftKings so graciously provides to us, detailing the breakdowns of the money and ticket splits for point spreads, money lines, and totals. 

In an article published on the VSiN.com website on opening day, Steve Makinen outlined 14 different systematic strategies for successfully using the DK Betting Splits Data that were developed in the last three seasons. Here are the systems and qualifying plays for the games as of 1:30 p.m. ET on Thursday. These can and will change, so continue to track and qualify the systems up until tip-off for best usage.

To summarize the findings from the first half data of the 2025-26 season, the sample contained 633 games, and for the most part, majority bettors have lost on all six point spread, money line, and total categories. In fact, this has been the worst half-season they have endured since I started studying this subject a few years ago. Here are the results:

– Majority handle on point spreads: 291-335 ATS (46.5%), -77.5 units – ROI: -12.4%
– Majority number of bets on point spreads: 287-323 ATS (47%), -68.3 units – ROI: -11.2%
– Majority handle on money lines: 379-247 (60.5%). -123.2 units – ROI: -20.2%
– Majority number of bets on money lines: 404-227 (64%). -113.7 units – ROI: -18%
– Majority handle on totals: 306-310 (49.7%). -35 units – ROI: -5.7%
– Majority number of bets on totals: 307-318 (49.1%), -42.8 units – ROI: -6.8%

DK NBA Betting Splits system #1: When 63% or more of the handle was on the side of a home team playing as a 4 point favorite or less (or as an underdog) on ATS wager, this “super” majority group has gone 211-174 ATS (54.8%) over the last 3+ seasons, good for +19.6 units of profit and an ROI of 5.1%. This is a fairly profitable system that the public seems to get right consistently.  If you see nearly 2/3 of the handle backing a host in an expected competitive NBA game this season, it’s a solid bet to follow it.
System Matches (PLAY ALL): ORLANDO, TORONTO

DK NBA Betting Splits system #2: When 59% or more of the handle has been on the road side of an ATS wager, this “super” majority group has gone 868-785 ATS (52.5%) over the last 3+ seasons. This has produced a profit of +4.5 units and an ROI of 0.3%. This has been a very consistent system since I first found it, and for its simplicity, fairly successful. However, it is down over 20 units so far in 2025-26, so perhaps tread lightly. Even still, remember that handle is the total amount of money on a game and is generally considered sharper. When a good portion of the overall money is on a road team in the NBA, it wins more often than not.
System Matches (SLIGHT PLAY ALL): NEW YORK, BOSTON

DK NBA Betting Splits system #3: It is a somewhat rare situation, but when there was a majority handle backing a home underdog in the NBA over the last 3+ seasons, that group produced a 135-106 ATS record (56%).  This has netted +18.4 units and an ROI of 7.6%. As a general rule, most bettors tend to bet favorites. This lot of 241 games was only about 5.0% of the total sample size.
System Matches (PLAY ALL): ORLANDO, TORONTO

DK NBA Betting Splits system #4: In another somewhat rare situation, when there was a majority handle backing the team with fewer wins on the season in the NBA over the last 3+ seasons, that group produced a 456-412 ATS record (52.5%), good for +2.8 units of profit and an ROI of 0.3%. This is another system that has dropped a bit this season but has still outperformed the normal levels by a decent amount. We’ll see if it can stay positive in the second half of the season.
System Matches (SLIGHT PLAY ALL): ORLANDO, TORONTO

DK NBA Betting Splits system #7: The number 63% or higher has been a key super-majority number in non-divisional conference games over the last 3+ seasons, with handle groups of that size boasting a 579-508 ATS record, good for 54.2%. This is over a 4% improvement on the overall majority figures and has netted +20.2 units of profit and an ROI of 1.9%.
System Matches (PLAY ALL): NEW YORK, ORLANDO, TORONTO

DK NBA Betting Splits system #8: Naturally, with super majority handles doing well on non-conference and non-divisional conference games as compared to the overall, the area where these groups would figure to struggle would be in divisional games. The super-majority number is a little higher. However, 67% in fact. When this super-majority number has backed a team in divisional games over the last three seasons, they are just 166-189 ATS, good for 46.8%. This is a 3%+ drop compared to the overall majority figures and has resulted in -41.9 units of loss and an ROI of -11.8%.
System Match (FADE): BOSTON

DK NBA Betting Splits system #10: Majority handle money line wagerers have struggled in each of the last three playoff seasons, with handle majorities going 149-110 for -44.87 units and an ROI of -18%. Compare this to the usual ML return of just over -5%, and you can see bettors are losing on a lot of favorite plays. This system will again be very significant starting in April.
System Matches (FADE ALL): NEW YORK ML, BOSTON ML, DENVER ML, ORLANDO ML, CLEVELAND ML, HOUSTON ML

DK NBA Betting Splits system #11: One of the best, simplest, and most frequent angles I have been able to uncover is when a majority of handle bettors were backing the Under in an NBA game. It is generally believed that most NBA bettors prefer taking Overs. When any majority number has favored the Under option over the last 3+ seasons, the results have been strong, with Under the total on these games going 484-393, good for 55.2%, +51.7 units, and an ROI of +5.9% since January 2023.
System Matches (PLAY UNDER ALL): DET-ORL, CLE-TOR, LAL-HOU

DK NBA Betting Splits system #12: There has been some decent success for number of bets majorities when they don’t get too heavily invested. In fact, majorities on either side of the total (Over or Under) of 57% or less have gone 409-367 (52.7%) for +5.3 units and an ROI of +0.7% since January 2023.
System Match (PLAY): OVER – DEN-MIN

DK NBA Betting Splits system #14: Majority handle Under bettors have been successful when sticking to their guns despite DraftKings raising total off of its opening number. These Under majorities have gone 200-153 (56.7%) since January 2023 by not getting baited into this totals trap. This has been the most profitable angle of all in terms of ROI, producing +31.7 units of profit for 9%.
System Match (PLAY UNDER): CLE-TOR

NBA Strength Ratings

The following NBA betting trends are taken from today’s MAKINEN DAILY RATINGS page under the NBA tab on VSiN.com. Listed by team, current line, and difference between rating and current line (in parentheses).

Top 3 UNDERPRICED UNDERDOGS according to the Makinen POWER RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches: 1. PHILADELPHIA +6.5 (+2.2)
2. ATLANTA +2.5 (+1.4)
3. MINNESOTA +6.5 (+1.1)

UNDERPRICED FAVORITES according to the Makinen POWER RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches: 1(tie). HOUSTON -3.5 (+0.8)
DETROIT -3.5 (+0.8)

UNDERPRICED UNDERDOG according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:
Ratings Match: MINNESOTA +6.5 (+0.4)

UNDERPRICED FAVORITES according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches: 1. DETROIT -3.5 (+0.9)
2. NEW YORK -2.5 (+0.2)
3. HOUSTON -3.5 (+0.1)

TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING OVER according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches: 1. NYK-ATL OVER 213.5 (+0.7)
2. BOS-PHI OVER 212.5 (+0.5)

Top 3 TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING UNDER according to the Makinen EFFECTIVE STRENGTH RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches: 1. DEN-MIN UNDER 225.5 (-3.8)
2. CLE-TOR UNDER 220.5 (-2.0)
3. DET-ORL UNDER 211.5 (-1.2)

Top 3 UNDERPRICED UNDERDOGS according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches: 1. PHILADELPHIA +6.5 (+3.3)
2. ATLANTA +2.5 (+1.2)
3. MINNESOTA +6.5 (+0.8)

UNDERPRICED FAVORITES according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches: 1. DETROIT -3.5 (+0.8)
2. HOUSTON -3.5 (+0.1)

Top 3 TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING OVER according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches: 1. DEN-MIN OVER 225.5 (+2.7)
2. NYK-ATL OVER 213.5 (+2.3)
3. BOS-PHI OVER 212.5 (+1.8)

TOTAL PROJECTIONS FAVORING UNDER according to the Makinen BETTORS RATINGS projections:
Ratings Matches: 1. CLE-TOR UNDER 220.5 (-2.6)
2. DET-ORL UNDER 211.5 (-0.7)

Previous articleEPL Best Bets and Predictions May 2-3
Steve Makinen
Steve Makinen
As one of the original founders of StatFox, Steve Makinen has been in the business of sports betting and data analysis for almost 25 years now. In his time in the industry, Steve has worked in a variety of capacities on both sides of the betting counter, from his early days of developing the StatFox business, to almost a decade of oddsmaking consulting for one of the world's leading sportsbooks, to his last seven years as Point Spread Weekly and Analytics Director with VSiN. Steve has always believed that number crunching and handicapping through foundational trends and systems is the secret to success and he shares this data with VSiN readers on a daily basis for all of the major sports.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR